Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Apr 23;15(4):e0232007.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232007. eCollection 2020.

Common mental disorders prevalence in adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analyses

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Common mental disorders prevalence in adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analyses

Sara Araújo Silva et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

An increasing number of original studies suggest the relevance of assessing mental health; however, there has been a lack of knowledge about the magnitude of Common Mental Disorders (CMD) in adolescents worldwide. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of CMD in adolescents, from the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Only studies composed by adolescents (10 to 19 years old) that evaluated the CMD prevalence according to the GHQ-12 were considered. The studies were searched in Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Lilacs, Adolec, Google Scholar, PsycINFO and Proquest. In addition, the reference lists of relevant reports were screened to identify potentially eligible articles. Studies were selected by independent reviewers, who also extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed to summarize the prevalence of CMD and estimate heterogeneity across studies. A total of 43 studies were included. Among studies that adopted the cut-off point of 3, the prevalence of CMD was 31.0% (CI 95% 28.0-34.0; I2 = 97.5%) and was more prevalent among girls. In studies that used the cut-off point of 4, the prevalence of CMD was 25.0% (CI 95% 19.0-32.0; I2 = 99.8%). Global prevalence of CMD in adolescents was 25.0% and 31.0%, using the GHQ cut-off point of 4 and 3, respectively. These results point to the need to include mental health as an important component of health in adolescence and to the need to include CMD screening as a first step in the prevention and control of mental disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow chart of systematic review procedure for illustrating search results, selection and inclusion of studies.
*Adapted from PRISMA.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Risk of bias in the included studies (The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal checklist for prevalence studies).
Fig 3
Fig 3
Common mental disorders prevalence in adolescents in studies with cut-off point 3 or more symptoms (A) and cut-off point 4 or more symptoms (B).
Fig 4
Fig 4
Funnel graph on the prevalence of common mental disorders in adolescents in studies with cut-off point 3 or more symptoms (A) and cut-off point 4 or more symptoms (B). Egger´s test: p<0.001.

References

    1. World Health Organization; Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates WHO World Heal Organ; [Internet]. 2017;1–24. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/254610/1/WHO-MSD-MER-2017.2-eng...
    1. UNICEF. The United NAtions Childre´s Fund. Adolescence: A Time That Matters [Internet]. 2002. 7–44 p. Available from: www.unicef.org
    1. James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–858. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldberg D. A bio-social model for common mental disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1994;385:66–70. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb05916.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun TB, Piccinelli M, Gureje O, et al. The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med. 1997;27(1):191–7. 10.1017/s0033291796004242 - DOI - PubMed