Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul:87:75-79.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.048. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

Affective temperament, attachment style, and the psychological impact of the COVID-19 outbreak: an early report on the Italian general population

Affiliations

Affective temperament, attachment style, and the psychological impact of the COVID-19 outbreak: an early report on the Italian general population

Lorenzo Moccia et al. Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 is severely affecting mental health worldwide, although individual response may vary. This study aims to investigate the psychological distress perceived by the Italian general population during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to analyze affective temperament and adult attachment styles as potential mediators. Through an online survey, we collected sociodemographic and lockdown-related information and evaluated distress, temperament, and attachment using the Kessler 10 Psychological Distress Scale (K10), the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego-Autoquestionnaire short version (TEMPS-A) and the Attachment Style Questionnaire (ASQ). In our sample (n = 500), 62% of the individuals reported no likelihood of psychological distress, whereas 19.4% and 18.6% displayed mild and moderate-to-severe likelihood. Cyclothymic (OR: 1.24; p < 0.001), depressive (OR: 1.52; p < 0.001) and anxious (OR: 1.58; p = 0.002) temperaments, and the ASQ "Need for approval" (OR: 1.08; p = 0.01) were risk factors for moderate-to-severe psychological distress compared to no distress, while the ASQ "Confidence" (OR: 0.89; p = 0.002) and "Discomfort with closeness" were protective (OR: 0.92; p = 0.001). Cyclothymic (OR: 1.17; p = 0.008) and depressive (OR: 1.32; p = 0.003) temperaments resulted as risk factors in subjects with moderate-to-severe psychological distress compared to mild distress, while the ASQ "Confidence" (OR: 0.92; p = 0.039) and "Discomfort with closeness" (OR: 0.94; p = 0.023) were protective. Our data indicated that a relevant rate of individuals may have experienced psychological distress following the COVID-19 outbreak. Specific affective temperament and attachment features predict the extent of mental health burden. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first data available on the psychological impact of the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on a sizeable sample of the Italian population. Moreover, our study is the first to investigate temperament and attachment characteristics in the psychological response to the ongoing pandemic. Our results provide further insight into developing targeted intervention strategies.

Keywords: Gender effect; General population; Personality; SARS-CoV-2; Stress response.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Akiskal K.K., Akiskal H.S. The theoretical underpinnings of affective temperaments: implications for evolutionary foundations of bipolar disorder and human nature. J. Affect. Disord. 2005;85(1–2):231–239. - PubMed
    1. Andrews G., Slade T. Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health. 2001;25(6):494–497. - PubMed
    1. Balestri M., Porcelli S., Souery D. Temperament and character influence on depression treatment outcome. J. Affect. Disord. 2019 Jun;1(252):464–474. - PubMed
    1. Bartholomew K., Horowitz L.M. Attachment styles among young adults. A test of a four-category model. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1991;61:226–244. - PubMed
    1. Brooks S.K., Webster R.K., Smith L.E. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):912–920. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms