Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr 15;12(4):976.
doi: 10.3390/cancers12040976.

Worldwide Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies Measuring the Effect of Mammography Screening Programmes on Incidence-Based Breast Cancer Mortality

Affiliations
Review

Worldwide Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies Measuring the Effect of Mammography Screening Programmes on Incidence-Based Breast Cancer Mortality

Amanda Dibden et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

In 2012, the Euroscreen project published a review of incidence-based mortality evaluations of breast cancer screening programmes. In this paper, we update this review to October 2019 and expand its scope from Europe to worldwide. We carried out a systematic review of incidence-based mortality studies of breast cancer screening programmes, and a meta-analysis of the estimated effects of both invitation to screening and attendance at screening, with adjustment for self-selection bias, on incidence-based mortality from breast cancer. We found 27 valid studies. The results of the meta-analysis showed a significant 22% reduction in breast cancer mortality with invitation to screening, with a relative risk of 0.78 (95% CI 0.75-0.82), and a significant 33% reduction with actual attendance at screening (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.61-0.75). Breast cancer screening in the routine healthcare setting continues to confer a substantial reduction in mortality from breast cancer.

Keywords: breast cancer; incidence-based mortality; mammography; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Literature search flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of invitation on risk of breast cancer mortality [14,18,20,23,24,25,28,30,32,33,36,38,41,47,48,49,52,53,54,55,56].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Estimated effect of attendance adjusted for self-selection on risk of breast cancer mortality (RR2) [14,15,17,20,23,32,33,38,40,45,49,50,54].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of invitation on risk of breast cancer mortality in women aged 50 and over [18,25,28,30,32,33,36,38,41,47,48,49,52,54,56].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Estimated effect of attendance adjusted for self-selection on risk of breast cancer mortality (RR2) in women aged 50 and over [15,32,33,38,40,45,49,50,54].

References

    1. Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: An independent review. Lancet (Lond. Engl.) 2012;380:1778–1786. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gotzsche P.C., Jorgensen K.J. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cancer Research UK Breast Cancer Incidence Statistics. [(accessed on 24 April 2019)]; Available online: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/s....
    1. Cancer Research UK Breast Cancer Mortality Statistics. [(accessed on 24 April 2019)]; Available online: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/s....
    1. Broeders M., Moss S., Nystrom L., Njor S., Jonsson H., Paap E., Massat N., Duffy S., Lynge E., Paci E. The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: A review of observational studies. J. Med. Screen. 2012;19:14–25. doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012078. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources