High-flow nasal cannula may be no safer than non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for COVID-19 patients
- PMID: 32326959
- PMCID: PMC7179373
- DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-02892-9
High-flow nasal cannula may be no safer than non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for COVID-19 patients
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Comment in
-
Compared to NIPPV, HFNC is more dangerous regarding aerosol dispersion and contamination of healthcare personnel: we are not sure.Crit Care. 2020 Aug 4;24(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03184-y. Crit Care. 2020. PMID: 32753062 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Guidelines on the Management of Critically Ill Adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun;48(6):e440-e469. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004363. Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32224769 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Leung CCH, Joynt GM, Gomersall CD, et al. Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula versus oxygen face mask for environmental bacterial contamination in critically ill pneumonia patients: a randomized controlled crossover trial. J Hosp Infect. 2019;101(1):84–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.10.007. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical