Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;43(7):1496-1503.
doi: 10.2337/dc19-2003. Epub 2020 Apr 23.

Cost and Cost-effectiveness of Large-scale Screening for Type 1 Diabetes in Colorado

Affiliations

Cost and Cost-effectiveness of Large-scale Screening for Type 1 Diabetes in Colorado

R Brett McQueen et al. Diabetes Care. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the costs and project the potential lifetime cost-effectiveness of the ongoing Autoimmunity Screening for Kids (ASK) program, a large-scale, presymptomatic type 1 diabetes screening program for children and adolescents in the metropolitan Denver region.

Research design and methods: We report the resource utilization, costs, and effectiveness measures from the ongoing ASK program compared with usual care (i.e., no screening). Additionally, we report a practical screening scenario by including utilization and costs relevant to routine screening in clinical practice. Finally, we project the potential cost-effectiveness of ASK and routine screening by identifying clinical benchmarks (i.e., diabetic ketoacidosis [DKA] events avoided, HbA1c improvements vs. no screening) needed to meet value thresholds of $50,000-$150,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained over a lifetime horizon.

Results: Cost per case detected was $4,700 for ASK screening and $14,000 for routine screening. To achieve value thresholds of $50,000-$150,000 per QALY gained, screening costs would need to be offset by cost savings through 20% reductions in DKA events at diagnosis in addition to 0.1% (1.1 mmol/mol) improvements in HbA1c over a lifetime compared with no screening for patients who develop type 1 diabetes. Value thresholds were not met from avoiding DKA events alone in either scenario.

Conclusions: Presymptomatic type 1 diabetes screening may be cost-effective in areas with a high prevalence of DKA and an infrastructure facilitating screening and monitoring if the benefits of avoiding DKA events and improved HbA1c persist over long-run time horizons. As more data are collected from ASK, the model will be updated with direct evidence on screening effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2017. Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States [Internet], 2017. Available from https://dev.diabetes.org/sites/default/files/2019-06/cdc-statistics-repo.... Accessed 9 November 2018
    1. Mayer-Davis EJ, Lawrence JM, Dabelea D, et al. .; SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study . Incidence trends of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among youths, 2002-2012. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1419–1429 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Epidemiology Research International Group Secular trends in incidence of childhood IDDM in 10 countries. Diabetes 1990;39:858–864 - PubMed
    1. Patterson CC, Dahlquist GG, Gyürüs E, Green A, Soltész G; EURODIAB Study Group . Incidence trends for childhood type 1 diabetes in Europe during 1989-2003 and predicted new cases 2005-20: a multicentre prospective registration study. Lancet 2009;373:2027–2033 - PubMed
    1. Steck AK, Rewers MJ. Genetics of type 1 diabetes. Clin Chem 2011;57:176–185 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms