Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 6:2020:4503919.
doi: 10.1155/2020/4503919. eCollection 2020.

Model-Based Weaning Tests for VA-ECLS Therapy

Affiliations

Model-Based Weaning Tests for VA-ECLS Therapy

Simon Habran et al. Comput Math Methods Med. .

Abstract

Venoarterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) is used in ICUs (intensive care units) for the most extreme presentations of acute and severe cardiogenic shock, and one of the main issues the clinicians have to deal with is the weaning from VA-ECLS. In this study, a patient-specific model of the cardiovascular system connected to a VA-ECLS is built to improve the understanding of this complex system. Pig experiments are performed to validate the model, and the results are quite promising since the mean difference between experimental data and simulation is smaller than 5% for all the hemodynamic quantities. It is also a major objective of this paper to provide a proof-of-concept analysis that model-based approaches could improve the weaning strategy for VA-ECLS therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Model of the cardiovascular system connected to a VA-ECLS. All symbols are defined in the text.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Heart rate in terms of Qd for the weaning tests Pig8 T1 and Pig8 T2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison between experimental and simulated maxT(Vh), P¯a, P¯v, SV, and PPa in terms of Qd for the weaning test Pig8 T1 and Pig8 T2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Values of Δ1Eh/Eh, Δ1SBV/SBV, Δ1Ah/Ah, Δ1Ea/Ea, and Δ1Rs/Rs for each weaning test.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison between experimental (crosses) and simulated (solid, dashed, and dotted lines) hemodynamic quantities in terms of Qd. “Sim. 1” and “Sim. 2” refer to our simulations with, respectively, Qd-independent and Qd-dependent physiological parameters, while “Brommé and Donker” indicates the results of the simulations in [5]. “Exp” refers to the experimental data of [22].

References

    1. Conrad S. A., Rycus P. T., Dalton H. Extracorporeal life support registry report 2004. ASAIO Journal. 2005;51(1):4–10. doi: 10.1097/01.MAT.0000151922.67540.E9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim H., Lim S. H., Hong J., et al. Efficacy of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Resuscitation. 2012;83(8):971–975. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.01.037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmidt M., Burrell A., Roberts L., et al. Predicting survival after ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: the survival after veno-arterial-ECMO (SAVE)-score. European Heart Journal. 2015;36(33):2246–2256. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv194. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aissaoui N., El-Banayosy A., Combes A. How to wean a patient from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Medicine. 2015;41(5):902–905. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3663-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broomé M., Donker D. W. Individualized real-time clinical decision support to monitor cardiac loading during venoarterial ECMO. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2016;14(1):p. 4. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0760-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types