Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Oct;25(10):e1516-e1524.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0701. Epub 2020 Apr 30.

Predicting Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Patients with Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Predicting Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Patients with Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Jaime Feliu et al. Oncologist. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Standard oncology tools are inadequate to distinguish which older patients are at higher risk of developing chemotherapy-related complications.

Materials and methods: Patients over 70 years of age starting new chemotherapy regimens were prospectively included in a multicenter study. A prechemotherapy assessment that included sociodemographics, tumor/treatment variables, and geriatric assessment variables was performed. Association between these factors and the development of grade 3-5 toxicity was examined by using logistic regression.

Results: A total of 551 patients were accrued. Chemotherapy doses (odds ratio [OR] 1.834; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.237-2.719) and creatinine clearance (OR 0.989; 95% CI 0.981-0.997) were the only factors independently associated with toxicity. Only 19% of patients who received reduced doses of chemotherapy and had a creatinine clearance ≥40 mL/minute had grade 3-4 toxicity, compared with 38% of those who received standard doses or had a creatinine clearance <40 mL/minute (p < .0001). However, no satisfactory multivariate model was obtained using different selection approaches.

Conclusion: Chemotherapy doses and renal function were identified as the major risk factors for developing severe toxicity in the older patient. These factors should be considered when planning to initiate a new chemotherapy regimen and should also lead to a closer follow-up in these patients.

Implications for practice: Older patients are more vulnerable to chemotherapy toxicity. However, standard tools are inadequate to identify who is at higher risk of developing chemotherapy-related complications. Chemotherapy doses (standard vs. reduced) and renal function were identified as the major risk factors for developing severe toxicity in the elderly. These factors should be considered when planning to initiate a new chemotherapy regimen and should also lead to a closer follow-up.

Keywords: Chemotherapy; Geriatric assessment; Older patient; Toxicity; Toxicity risk score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:7–30. - PubMed
    1. Haller DG, O'Connell MJ, Cartwright TH et al. Impact of age and medical comorbidity on adjuvant treatment outcomes for stage III colon cancer: A pooled analysis of individual patient data from four randomized, controlled trials. Ann Oncol 2015;26:715–724. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Langer CJ, Manola J, Bernardo P et al. Cisplatin‐based therapy for elderly patients with advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer: Implications of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 5592, a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:173–181. - PubMed
    1. Hurria A, Wong FL, Villaluna D et al. Role of age and health in treatment recommendations for older adults with breast cancer: The perspective of oncologists and primary care providers. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:5386–5392. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Potosky AL, Harlan LC, Kaplan RS et al. Age, sex, and racial differences in the use of standard adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1192–1202. - PubMed

Publication types