In Reply
- PMID: 32329954
- DOI: 10.1111/acem.13996
In Reply
Comment on
-
Troponin Testing and Coronary Syndrome in Geriatric Patients With Nonspecific Complaints: Are We Overtesting?Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Jan;27(1):6-14. doi: 10.1111/acem.13766. Epub 2019 Dec 19. Acad Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 31854117
-
Second Look: The Predictive Value of Elevated Cardiac Troponins Often Depends on Retesting.Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Jul;27(7):644-645. doi: 10.1111/acem.14011. Epub 2020 Jun 23. Acad Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 32412107 No abstract available.
References
-
- Andruchow JE, Kavsak PA, McRae AD. Contemporary emergency department management of patients with chest pain: a concise review and guide for the high-sensitivity troponin era. Can J Cardiol 2018;34:98-108.
-
- Reinhardt SW, Lin C-J, Novak E, Brown DL. Noninvasive cardiac testing vs clinical evaluation alone in acute chest pain: a secondary analysis of the ROMICAT-II randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2018;178:212-9.
-
- Hermann LK, Newman DH, Pleasant WA, et al. Yield of routine provocative cardiac testing among patients in an emergency department-based chest pain unit. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:1128-33.
-
- Fanning JP, Nyong J, Scott IA, Aroney CN, Walters DL. Routine invasive strategies versus selective invasive strategies for unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the stent era. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;(5):CD004815.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources