A systematic scoping review of COVID-19 during pregnancy and childbirth
- PMID: 32330287
- PMCID: PMC9087748
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13182
A systematic scoping review of COVID-19 during pregnancy and childbirth
Abstract
Background: Clinical presentation and outcomes of COVID-19 infection during pregnancy remain limited and fragmented.
Objectives: To summarize the existing literature on COVID-19 infection during pregnancy and childbirth, particularly concerning clinical presentation and outcomes.
Search strategy: A systematic search of LitCovid, EBSCO MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus electronic databases. The references of relevant studies were also searched.
Selection criteria: Identified titles and abstracts were screened to select original reports and cross-checked for overlap of cases.
Data collection and analysis: A descriptive summary organized by aspects of clinical presentations (symptoms, imaging, and laboratory) and outcomes (maternal and perinatal).
Main results: We identified 33 studies reporting 385 pregnant women with COVID-19 infection: 368 (95.6%) mild; 14 (3.6%) severe; and 3 (0.8%) critical. Seventeen women were admitted to intensive care, including six who were mechanically ventilated and one maternal mortality. A total of 252 women gave birth, comprising 175 (69.4%) cesarean and 77 (30.6%) vaginal births. Outcomes for 256 newborns included four RT-PCR positive neonates, two stillbirths, and one neonatal death.
Conclusion: COVID-19 infection during pregnancy probably has a clinical presentation and severity resembling that in non-pregnant adults. It is probably not associated with poor maternal or perinatal outcomes.
Keywords: COVID-19; Childbirth; Coronavirus; Neonate; Pregnancy; Systematic scoping review.
© 2020 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) outbreak in China. JAMA. 2020;323:1239. - PubMed
-
- Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.
-
- Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA‐ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–473. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical