Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 22;12(4):1030.
doi: 10.3390/cancers12041030.

PET-FDG: Impetus

Affiliations

PET-FDG: Impetus

Cristina Nanni. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG)recommends FDG PET/CT (Fluoro-Deoxy-glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography) as the gold standard imaging modality for initial evaluation and response to therapy assessment in multiple myeloma. In fact, FDG PET/CT, provides multiple useful indexes to risk-stratify patients and has significant prognostic value. However, multiple myeloma remains a complex disease to interpret on imaging. The Italian myeloma criteria for PET use (IMPeTUs) were proposed to standardize FDG PET/CT reading in multiple myeloma. In this communication an overview on IMPeTUs is provided as well as some examples of application.

Keywords: FDG; IMPeTUs; PET; interpretation criteria; multiple myeloma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) MIP (Maximum Intensity Projection); (B) PET (Positron Emission Tomography) sagittal cut to highlight the bone marrow diffuse uptake; (C) CT (Computed Tomography) sagittal cut. No abnormal uptake is present.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) MIP; (B) PET sagittal cut; (C) CT sagittal cut; (DI) fused images and CT axial cut on different focal lesions. There are at least three focal hot spots with no underlying lytic lesions (D: vertebra, F: sacrum, H: right rib).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) MIP; (B) PET sagittal cut; (C) fused images axial cut; (D) CT axial cut. There are at least four focal hot spots with lytic lesions underlying and a subcutaneous lesion in the left thorax (C).
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) MIP; (B) PET sagittal cut; (C) CT sagittal cut. There is a diffuse and severe bone marrow uptake in limbs, pelvis and spine.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) MIP; (B) PET sagittal cut; (C) fused images axial cut; (D) CT axial cut; (E) fused images axial cut. There is a lytic lesion in the sternum involving surrounding tissues (C) and a cold lytic lesion in the right bony pelvis (E).

References

    1. Rajkumar S.V., Dimopolous M.A., Palumbo A., Blade J., Merlini G., Mateos M.V., Kumar S., Hillengass J., Kastritis E., Richardson P., et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:538–548. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rasche L., Angtuaco E., McDonald J.E., Buros A., Stein C., Pawlyn C., Thanendrarajan S., Schinke C., Samant R., Yaccoby S., et al. Low expression of hexokinase-2 is associated with false-negative FDG-positron emission tomography in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2017;130:30–34. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-03-774422. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abe Y., Ikeda S., Kitadate A., Narita K., Kobayashi H., Miura D., Takeuchi M., O’uchi E., O’uchi T., Matsue K. Low hexokinase-2 expression-associated false-negative 18F-FDG PET/CT as a potential prognostic predictor in patients with multiple myeloma. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2019;46:1345–1350. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04312-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Terpos E., Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I., Gavriatopoulou M., Dimopoulos M.A. Pathogenesis of bone disease in multiple myeloma: From bench to bedside. Blood Cancer J. 2018;8:7. doi: 10.1038/s41408-017-0037-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dimopoulos M.A., Terpos E., Chanan-Khan A., Leung N., Ludwig H., Jagannath S., Niesvizky R., Giralt S., Fermand J.P., Bladé J., et al. Renal impairment in patients with multiple myeloma: A consensus statement on behalf of the International Myeloma Working Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:4976–4984. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.8791. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources