Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Aug 1;26(15):4135-4142.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3529. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

Impact of DNA Damage Response and Repair (DDR) Gene Mutations on Efficacy of PD-(L)1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Affiliations
Observational Study

Impact of DNA Damage Response and Repair (DDR) Gene Mutations on Efficacy of PD-(L)1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Biagio Ricciuti et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: DNA damage response and repair (DDR) gene alterations are associated with increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, higher genomic instability, and higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) in cancer. Whether DDR alterations are associated with clinical outcomes to programmed death ligand 1 [PD-(L)1] blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unknown.

Experimental design: Tumors from patients treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitors were analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). Cancers were categorized on the basis of the presence or absence of deleterious mutations across a panel of 53 DDR genes. Clinical outcomes to PD-(L)1 inhibitors were evaluated according to DDR mutation status.

Results: Of 266 patients with successful NGS who received PD-(L)1 inhibitors, 132 (49.6%) were identified as having deleterious DDR mutations (DDR-positive). DDR-positive and DDR-negative groups were similar in terms of baseline clinicopathologic characteristics. The median TMB was significantly higher in the DDR-positive group compared with the DDR-negative group (12.1 vs. 7.6 mutations/megabase; P < 0.001). Compared with DDR-negative patients (N = 134), DDR-positive patients had a significantly higher objective response rate (30.3% vs. 17.2%; P = 0.01), longer median progression-free survival [PFS; 5.4 vs. 2.2 months; HR, 0.58 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-0.76); P < 0.001], and longer median overall survival [OS; 18.8 vs. 9.9 months; HR, 0.57 (95% CI, 0.42-0.77); P < 0.001] with PD-(L)1 therapy. After adjusting for PD-L1, TMB, performance status, tobacco use, and line of therapy, DDR-positive status was associated with a significantly longer PFS [HR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.51-0.92); P = 0.01] and OS [HR, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.43-0.85); P = 0.004] in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: Deleterious DDR mutations are frequent in NSCLC and are associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC treated with PD-(L)1 blockade.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms