Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun;28(3):161-164.
doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000621.

Enhanced recovery after head and neck cancer surgery: a review of current literature

Affiliations
Review

Enhanced recovery after head and neck cancer surgery: a review of current literature

Laura-Jayne Watson et al. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is well documented in a number of surgical specialities. However, it remains an emerging concept in surgical head and neck cancer care. The purpose of this review is to appraise the current evidence investigating enhanced recovery in head and neck cancer, and explore areas for future clinical research.

Recent findings: There were three key themes in enhanced recovery from the current head and neck cancer literature: early oral feeding, fistula closure and service delivery. This evidence is emerging and the quality of papers remains variable which makes it difficult to draw robust clinical recommendations. However, there are some encouraging clinical findings with regards to early oral feeding protocols and suturing of the trachea-stoma.

Summary: There is limited literature in enhanced recovery in head and neck cancer, with questionable quality of the papers reviewed. As such, there is no consensus for a standardized enhanced recovery pathway which demonstrates effective service delivery and positive patient outcomes. It is clear that implementation of enhanced recovery pathways is complex and requires patient and clinician buy in. Future research should focus on co-design of a methodologically sound enhanced recovery pathway with evaluation of its implementation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Melnyk M, Casey RG, Black P, Koupparis AJ. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols: time to change practice? (Review). Can Urol Assoc J 2011; 5:342.
    1. Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, et al. A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 2009; 136:842–847.
    1. Boyce S, Meyers A. Oral feeding after total laryngectomy. Head Neck 1989; 11:269–273.
    1. CASP: Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. https://casp-uk.net/casp-toolschecklists/. [Accessed 06 January 2020]
    1. Seven H, Calis AB, Turgut S. A randomized controlled trial of early oral feeding in laryngectomized patients. Laryngoscope 2003; 113:1076–1079.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources