Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 24;11(4):280.
doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2464-6.

DNA:RNA hybrids form at DNA double-strand breaks in transcriptionally active loci

Affiliations

DNA:RNA hybrids form at DNA double-strand breaks in transcriptionally active loci

Aldo S Bader et al. Cell Death Dis. .

Abstract

The recent discovery of DNA:RNA hybrids, or R-loops, actively forming at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) has unlocked fresh insight into how RNA participates in DNA repair. However, the manner of DSB-induced R-loop formation is vital in determining its mechanism of action and is currently under debate. Here, we analyse published DNA:RNA-hybrid sequencing to elucidate the features that determine DSB-induced R-loop formation. We found that pre-existing transcriptional activity was critical for R-loop generation at break sites, suggesting that these RNAs are transcribed prior to break induction. In addition, this appeared to be a specific DSB response at the break, distinct from traditional, co-transcriptionally formed R-loops. We hypothesise that R-loop formation is orchestrated by the damage response at transcriptionally active DSB loci to specifically maintain these genomic regions. Further investigation is required to fully understand how canonical repair processes regulate R-loops at breaks and how they participate in the repair process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. DSB-induced R-loops form in a transcription-dependent manner.
Boxplots (top) and metagenes (bottom) of R-loop generation at ASISI-induced double-strand breaks. a The 99 breaks are grouped by their repair pathway preference (determined by Aymard et al.). b Breaks are grouped by their genomic location status. c Breaks are grouped by their relative transcriptional activity (determined by Aymard et al.). DRIP read coverage was calculated and normalised to the total read number; then the log2 fold change of broken (+4OHT) over unbroken (−4OHT) was calculated. Statistics were calculated using a directional, unpaired Wilcoxon signed-rank non-parametric test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Transcriptional activity is a central driving force behind DSB-induced R-loop formation.
a Genome browser plots of ASISI-induced double-strand breaks with and without break induction where R-loop generation correlates with transcriptional activity. Two individual sites are shown; one with high transcriptional activity (top) and one with low transcriptional activity (bottom). b Same as a, except at sites where R-loop generation does not correlate with transcriptional activity. c Correlation plot of relative transcriptional activity against the break-induced R-loop generation at each of the ASISI-induced double-strand break sites. Correlation and p values determined by Pearson correlation testing. d Heatmap of break-induced R-loop generation around each ASISI-induced double-strand break site with the sites ordered from the highest (top) to the lowest (bottom) transcriptional activity.

References

    1. Richardson C, Jasin M. Frequent chromosomal translocations induced by DNA double-strand breaks. Nature. 2000;405:697–700. doi: 10.1038/35015097. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tatsumi-Miyajima J, Yagi T, Takebe H. Analysis of mutations caused by DNA double-strand breaks produced by a restriction enzyme in shuttle vector plasmids propagated in ataxia telangiectasia cells. Mutat. Res./DNA Repair. 1993;294:317–323. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(93)90014-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sandoval N, et al. Characterization of ATM gene mutations in 66 ataxia telangiectasia families. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1999;8:69–79. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.1.69. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miki Y, et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science. 1994;266:66–71. doi: 10.1126/science.7545954. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Finzel A, Grybowski A, Strasen J, Cristiano E, Loewer A. Hyperactivation of ATM upon DNA-PKcs inhibition modulates p53 dynamics and cell fate in response to DNA damage. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2016;27:2360–2367. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e16-01-0032. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types