Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Aug 1;107(5):964-973.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.04.019. Epub 2020 Apr 22.

Phase 1 Trial of Concurrent Gemcitabine and Cisplatin with Image Guided Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locoregionally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase 1 Trial of Concurrent Gemcitabine and Cisplatin with Image Guided Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locoregionally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma

Loren K Mell et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Abstract

Purpose: The use of concurrent doublet chemotherapy with radiation for locoregionally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is limited by gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity. By reducing radiation dose to bowel and bone marrow, image guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) may improve chemotherapy tolerance. The goal of this study was to determine whether IG-IMRT could lead to improved tolerance to concurrent cisplatin and gemcitabine for LACC.

Methods and materials: We conducted an open-label, nonrandomized, prospective phase 1 dose escalation trial at a tertiary academic cancer center (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01554410). We enrolled patients with stage IB-IVA cervical cancer, with either an intact cervix or posthysterectomy with residual/recurrent pelvic or paraortic nodal involvement, undergoing radical pelvic or extended field chemoradiation therapy. Treatment consisted of chemoradiation with IG-IMRT (45-47.6 Gy, 25-28 fractions to the pelvis ± paraortic nodes with simultaneous nodal boost to 53.2-59.4 Gy, 28 fractions) plus 5 cycles of concurrent weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2 with escalating doses of gemcitabine (50, 75, 100, or 125 mg/m2). Cohorts were separated preregistration according to whether the patient received pelvic or extended field IG-IMRT and whether gemcitabine followed (CG) or preceded (GC) cisplatin delivery. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) events were monitored up to 30 days after chemoradiation therapy. The primary endpoint was maximum tolerated dose (MTD) resulting in DLT probability ≤20%.

Results: Between February 2011 and June 2019, 35 patients were registered. Overall, 7 patients (20.0%) experienced DLTs. For the pelvic field cohort, the estimated MTD was 100 mg/m2 with GC sequencing, which is higher than the previously reported MTD for this regimen. The extended field cohort was closed after 2 of 3 patients experienced a DLT at the first dose level.

Conclusions: IG-IMRT can permit higher doses of concurrent gemcitabine with cisplatin and pelvic radiation for LACC. However, acute toxicity remains a factor with this regimen, depending on radiation volume and chemotherapy sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
CONSORT diagram and cohort distribution.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Outcomes for patients with cervical cancer treated with image guided intensity modulated radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin and gemcitabine. (A) Overall survival. (B) Disease-free survival. (C) Locoregional failure.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Longitudinal changes in acute blood counts according to chemotherapy sequencing in patients receiving pelvic irradiation with cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly and gemcitabine ≥75 mg/m2 weekly. (A) Absolute neutrophil counts, k/μL. (B) lymphocyte counts, k/μL. (C) Hemoglobin levels, g/dL. (D) Platelet counts, k/μL. Follow-up values were obtained 1 to 3 months after completion of therapy. Abbreviations: CG = cisplatin followed by gemcitabine; GC = gemcitabine followed by cisplatin.

Comment in

  • In Regard to Mell et al.
    Yuce Sari S, Gultekin M, Yildiz F. Yuce Sari S, et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Nov 15;108(4):1115-1116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.045. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020. PMID: 33069340 No abstract available.
  • In Reply to Sari et al.
    Mell LK, Xu R, Saenz CC. Mell LK, et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Nov 15;108(4):1116-1117. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.044. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020. PMID: 33069341 No abstract available.

References

    1. Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, et al. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1154–1161. - PubMed
    1. Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, et al. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1137–1143. - PubMed
    1. Eifel PJ, Winter K, Morris M, et al. Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: An update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90–01. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:872–880. - PubMed
    1. Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, et al. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1144–1153. - PubMed
    1. Green JA, Kirwan JM, Tierney JF, et al. Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2001;358:781–786. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data