Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun:46:101759.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101759. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

Exploring health care professionals views on alternative approaches to cancer follow-up and barriers and facilitators to implementation of a recovery package

Affiliations

Exploring health care professionals views on alternative approaches to cancer follow-up and barriers and facilitators to implementation of a recovery package

Susan Williamson et al. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To meet the long-term needs of cancer survivors the focus of recent cancer care reform in the United Kingdom (UK) has been the implementation of alternative follow-up strategies to relieve the growing pressures threatening to overwhelm cancer services. In 2013, the UK's National Cancer Survivorship Initiative recommended an integrated package of care called the Recovery Package to meet cancer survivors' psychosocial and information needs and supported self-management.

Method: We aimed to explore health care professionals' views of alternative strategies for follow-up care, and perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation of the Recovery Package for patients who had completed treatment for cancer. Semi-structured interviews with 19 participants sought views and experiences of key aspects of cancer care follow-up and aspects of the Recovery Package implementation.

Results: Seven themes emerged from the data; sustainability and capacity, cost implications, primary care, self-management, recovery package, resistance to change, and visions for the future. Traditional hospital follow-up was considered suitable for patients with complex needs, rarer forms of cancer and/or a poorer prognosis. Risk stratification was considered a vital element of any future strategy as was interoperability of digital communication systems between health care providers. Charitable funding had enabled one site to introduce all elements of the recovery package for patients with common cancers.

Conclusion: Charitable funding had enabled implementation of elements of the Recovery Package. However, new approaches require services to be commissioned and funded appropriately with effective communication between patients and primary and secondary care facilitated by interoperability of health care records.

Keywords: Alternative follow-up; Cancer care; Interoperability of health care records; Recovery package; Self-management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest.

LinkOut - more resources