Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 25;19(1):95.
doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01353-w.

Co-production of gallic acid and a novel cell-associated tannase by a pigment-producing yeast, Sporidiobolus ruineniae A45.2

Affiliations

Co-production of gallic acid and a novel cell-associated tannase by a pigment-producing yeast, Sporidiobolus ruineniae A45.2

Apinun Kanpiengjai et al. Microb Cell Fact. .

Abstract

Background: Gallic acid has received a significant amount of interest for its biological properties. Thus, there have been recent attempts to apply this substance in various industries and in particular the feed industry. As opposed to yeasts, fungi and bacteria and their tannases have been well documented for their potential bioconversion and specifically for the biotransformation of tannic acid to gallic acid. In this research, Sporidiobolus ruineniae A45.2 is introduced as a newly pigment-producing and tannase-producing yeast that has gained great interest for its use as an additive in animal feed. However, there is a lack of information on the efficacy of gallic acid production from tannic acid and the relevant tannase properties. The objective of this research study is to optimize the medium composition and conditions for the co-production of gallic acid from tannic acid and tannase with a focus on developing an integrated production strategy for its application as a feed additive.

Results: Tannase produced by S. ruineniae A45.2 has been classified as a cell-associated tannase (CAT). Co-production of gallic acid obtained from tannic acid and CAT by S. ruineniae A45.2 was optimized using response surface methodology and then validated with the synthesis of 11.2 g/L gallic acid from 12.3 g/L tannic acid and the production of 31.1 mU/mL CAT after 48 h of cultivation in a 1-L stirred tank fermenter. Tannase was isolated from the cell wall, purified and characterized in comparison with its native form (CAT). The purified enzyme (PT) revealed the same range of pH and temperature optima (pH 7) as CAT but was distinctively less stable. Specifically, CAT was stable at up to 70 °C for 60 min, and active under its optimal conditions (40 °C) at up to 8 runs.

Conclusion: Co-production of gallic acid and CAT is considered an integrated and green production strategy. S. ruineniae biomass could be promoted as an alternative source of carotenoids and tannase. Thus, the biomass, in combination with gallic acid that was formed in the fermentation medium, could be directly used as a feed additive. On the other hand, gallic acid could be isolated and purified for food and pharmaceutical applications. This paper is the first of its kind to report that the CAT obtained from yeast can be resistant to high temperatures of up to 70 °C.

Keywords: Gallic acid; Miang; Sporidiobolus ruineniae; Tannase; Tannins; Yeast.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Growth of S. ruineniae A45.2 on YMA supplemented with 10 g/L tannic acid (a) and clear zone formation of nine tannin-tolerant yeast isolates on YMA supplemented with 10 g/L tannic acid (b) after culturing at 30 °C for 3 days
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Three-dimensional curves and contour plots demonstrating the effect of glucose and tannic acid on gallic acid production (a), tannase (b) and viable cells (c)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Time course of batch fermentation for co-production of gallic acid, CAT and viable cells using optimized medium and conditions by S. ruineniae A45.2 in 1-L fermenter
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Molecular weight determination of tannase by SDS-PAGE (a) and gel filtration chromatography (b)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Effect of pH on tannase activity (a), stability (b). Effect of temperature on tannase activity (c) and stability (d)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Operational stability of CAT under repeated use

References

    1. Nowak R, Olech M, Nowacka N. Chapter 97—plant polyphenols as chemopreventive agents. In: Watson RR, Preedy VR, Zibadi S, editors. Polyphenols in human health and disease. San Diego: Academic Press; 2014. pp. 1289–1307.
    1. Yin-Yin O, Ieva S. Gallic acid and gallic acid derivatives: effects on drug metabolizing enzymes. Cur Drug Metab. 2003;4:241–248. doi: 10.2174/1389200033489479. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bajpai B, Patil S. A new approach to microbial production of gallic acid. Braz J Microbiol. 2008;39:708–711. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822008000400021. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jung S, Choe JH, Kim B, Yun H, Kruk ZA, Jo C. Effect of dietary mixture of gallic acid and linoleic acid on antioxidative potential and quality of breast meat from broilers. Meat Sci. 2010;86:520–526. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.06.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Samuel KG, Wang J, Yue HY, Wu SG, Zhang HJ, Duan ZY, Qi GH. Effects of dietary gallic acid supplementation on performance, antioxidant status, and jejunum intestinal morphology in broiler chicks. Poult Sci. 2017;96:2768–2775. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex091. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms