Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Aug;34(8):795-804.
doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0301. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

The Impact of Restaging Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor on Survival Parameters in T1 Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The Impact of Restaging Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor on Survival Parameters in T1 Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Wojciech Krajewski et al. J Endourol. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Background: T1, high-grade, nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is characterized by a high recurrence rate and progression to muscle-invasive disease concerns a significant number of patients. To overcome limitations of initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), various strategies are proposed in the literature. One of them is performance of restaging TURBT (re-TURBT). In recent years, it has been shown that re-TURBT can provide valuable additional pathologic information. However, its potential effect on survival improvement is debatable and benefits from this procedure have been suggested to be dependent on several clinicopathological factors (e.g., the presence of detrusor muscle in initial TURBT). Evidence Acquisition: A systematic search was conducted within the three electronic databases, including Medline, Scopus, and Embase. The following outcomes were retrieved: outcome measurements of recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS), including hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Initially, a main analysis for each outcome (RFS, PFS, CSS, and OS) was performed. Subsequently, we conducted subgroup analyses for the following factors: T1 grade, presence of detrusor muscle in initial TURBT, and type of adjuvant intravesical therapy. Evidence Synthesis: Finally, six studies with overall 3257 participants were identified for this meta-analysis. A significant impact of re-TURBT on RFS, PFS, CSS, and OS was not found in the overall analysis that included all patients with T1 bladder tumors. On the other hand, subgroup analyses, including studies reporting cohorts with mixed T1 tumor grading, revealed that re-TURBT was associated with significantly better RFS, PFS, and OS. Conclusions: This meta-analysis shows that re-TURBT does not improve survival outcomes in patients with T1 tumors; however, results of some particular subgroup analyses indicate its potential positive impact on the subsequent course of the disease. Furthermore, high-quality, prospective, randomized controlled trials are necessary to make a final statement about the therapeutic role of re-TURBT in T1 NMIBC.

Keywords: bladder cancer; repeat; restaging; second look; transurethral resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources