Mechanical power production assessment during weightlifting exercises. A systematic review
- PMID: 32336212
- DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2020.1747529
Mechanical power production assessment during weightlifting exercises. A systematic review
Abstract
The assessment of the mechanical power production is of great importance for researchers and practitioners. The purpose of this review was to compare the differences in ground reaction force (GRF), kinematic, and combined (bar velocity x GRF) methods to assess mechanical power production during weightlifting exercises. A search of electronic databases was conducted to identify all publications up to 31 May 2019. The peak power output (PPO) was selected as the key variable. The exercises included in this review were clean variations, which includes the hang power clean (HPC), power clean (PC) and clean. A total of 26 articles met the inclusion criteria with 53.9% using the GRF, 38.5% combined, and 30.8% the kinematic method. Articles were evaluated and descriptively analysed to enable comparison between methods. The three methods have inherent methodological differences in the data analysis and measurement systems, which suggests that these methods should not be used interchangeably to assess PPO in Watts during weightlifting exercises. In addition, this review provides evidence and rationale for the use of the GRF to assess power production applied to the system mass while the kinematic method may be more appropriate when looking to assess only the power applied to the barbell.
Keywords: Peak power output; force platform; kinematics; kinetics; power clean.
Similar articles
-
The effect of load based on body mass percentage on peak power output in the hang power clean, hang high pull, and mid-thigh clean pull.J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2022 Apr;62(4):457-466. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12243-1. Epub 2021 Jul 13. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2022. PMID: 34256535
-
Comparison of the Power Output Between the Hang Power Clean and Hang High Pull Across a Wide Range of Loads in Weightlifters.J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Feb 1;35(Suppl 1):S84-S88. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003569. J Strength Cond Res. 2021. PMID: 32149888
-
Comparison of four different methods to measure power output during the hang power clean and the weighted jump squat.J Strength Cond Res. 2007 May;21(2):314-20. doi: 10.1519/R-22896.1. J Strength Cond Res. 2007. PMID: 17530989
-
Unique aspects of competitive weightlifting: performance, training and physiology.Sports Med. 2012 Sep 1;42(9):769-90. doi: 10.1007/BF03262294. Sports Med. 2012. PMID: 22873835 Review.
-
Weightlifting pulling derivatives: rationale for implementation and application.Sports Med. 2015 Jun;45(6):823-39. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0314-y. Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 25689955 Review.
Cited by
-
Determining the Peak Power Output for Weightlifting Derivatives Using Body Mass Percentage: A Practical Approach.Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Apr 20;3:628068. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.628068. eCollection 2021. Front Sports Act Living. 2021. PMID: 33959705 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous