Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr 26;9(1):94.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01344-3.

The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review

Affiliations
Review

The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review

Emma Coles et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Recognising the influence of context and the context-sensitive nature of quality improvement (QI) interventions is crucial to implementing effective improvements and successfully replicating them in new settings, yet context is still poorly understood. To address this challenge, it is necessary to capture generalisable knowledge, first to understand which aspects of context are most important to QI and why, and secondly, to explore how these factors can be managed to support healthcare improvement, in terms of implementing successful improvement initiatives, achieving sustainability and scaling interventions. The research question was how and why does context influence quality improvement initiatives in healthcare?

Methods: A realist review explored the contextual conditions that influence healthcare improvement. Realist methodology integrates theoretical understanding and stakeholder input with empirical research findings. The review aimed to identify and understand the role of context during the improvement cycle, i.e. planning, implementation, sustainability and transferability; and distil new knowledge to inform the design and development of context-sensitive QI initiatives. We developed a preliminary theory of the influence of context to arrive at a conceptual and theoretical framework.

Results: Thirty-five studies were included in the review, demonstrating the interaction of key contextual factors across healthcare system levels during the improvement cycle. An evidence-based explanatory theoretical model is proposed to illustrate the interaction between contextual factors, system levels (macro, meso, micro) and the stages of the improvement journey. Findings indicate that the consideration of these contextual factors would enhance the design and delivery of improvement initiatives, across a range of improvement settings.

Conclusions: This is the first realist review of context in QI and contributes to a deeper understanding of how context influences quality improvement initiatives. The distillation of key contextual factors offers the potential to inform the design and development of context-sensitive interventions to enhance improvement initiatives and address the challenge of spread and sustainability. Future research should explore the application of our conceptual model to enhance improvement-planning processes.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42017062135.

Keywords: Context; Evidence-based practice; Health improvement; Healthcare; Implementation; Knowledge translation; Quality improvement; Realist review; Realist synthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the realist review process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Healthcare QI context map
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Realist framework based on programme theory
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Revised context map
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Evidence-informed explanatory theoretical model

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Health Foundation . Quality improvement made simple. London: Health Foundation; 2013.
    1. Batalden PB, Davidoff F. What is ‘quality improvement’ and how can it transform healthcare? Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16(1):2–3. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.022046. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dixon-Woods M. Improving quality and safety in healthcare. Clin Med. 2019;19(1):47–56. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-1-47. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Health Foundation . Overcoming challenges to improving quality. Lessons from the Health Foundation’s improvement programme evaluations and relevant literature. London: Health Foundation; 2012. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shekelle PG, Pronovost PJ, Wachter RM, Taylor SL, Dy S, Foy R, et al. Assessing the evidence for context-sensitive effectiveness and safety of patient safety practices: developing criteria. AHRQ Publication No. 11-0006-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010.

Publication types