Comparison of transurethral and open subcapsular prostatectomy: relation to weight of the prostate
- PMID: 3233633
Comparison of transurethral and open subcapsular prostatectomy: relation to weight of the prostate
Abstract
The results of transurethral prostatectomy in 2,269 men and open subcapsular prostatectomy in 300 men were compared. The only significant differences between the two groups were in the duration of hospital stay (18.3 vs 26.2 days) and the number of days that the drainage catheter was indwelling (5.4 days in the transurethral and 10.9 days in the open surgery group [P less than 0.01, both comparisons]). Blood loss, the need for transfusion, the amount of blood transfused, and the duration of surgery, catheterization, and hospital stay were all related to prostate size. Transurethral resection was superior to open resection for prostates weighing less than 20 gm; prostates of 20 gm to 30 gm were the easiest to enucleate.
Similar articles
-
Holmium laser enucleation for prostate adenoma greater than 100 gm.: comparison to open prostatectomy.J Urol. 2001 Feb;165(2):459-62. doi: 10.1097/00005392-200102000-00025. J Urol. 2001. PMID: 11176396
-
Reduction of length of hospital stay after transurethral resection of prostate by early catheter removal: a retrospective analysis.Nepal Med Coll J. 2007 Jun;9(2):84-7. Nepal Med Coll J. 2007. PMID: 17899954
-
Does a history of previous surgery or radiation to the prostate affect outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?BJU Int. 2009 Jun;103(12):1696-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08276.x. Epub 2008 Dec 23. BJU Int. 2009. PMID: 19154449
-
[Transurethral resection of prostate weighing over 100G].Hinyokika Kiyo. 1988 Dec;34(12):2121-7. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1988. PMID: 2467540 Japanese.
-
Surgical and anaesthetic considerations in transurethral resection of the prostate.Anaesth Intensive Care. 1987 May;15(2):203-11. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8701500215. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1987. PMID: 3300410 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Holmium laser prostatectomy.Curr Urol Rep. 2001 Aug;2(4):269-76. doi: 10.1007/s11934-001-0063-3. Curr Urol Rep. 2001. PMID: 12084251 Review.