Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 22:105:109757.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109757. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

Effect of anthropometry scaling on the response of the piper child scalable human body model subject to pelvic impact

Affiliations

Effect of anthropometry scaling on the response of the piper child scalable human body model subject to pelvic impact

Marie-Christine Chevalier et al. J Biomech. .

Abstract

The Open Source PIPER child scalable human body model was publicly released in April 2017 (www.piper-project.org) along with frontal and side impact validation conditions. The objective of this paper is to investigate the effect of anthropometry scaling on the response of the model in side pelvic impact. Three setups from two published studies were used: (1) a lateral drop test (2) a greater trochanter impact with a rigid pendulum (3) a pelvis side impact with a flat surface. The first study used scaling assumption developed for crash test dummy design (setups 1 and 2) and the second performed tests on post mortem human surrogates. The baseline 6 years old child model was scaled using a model morphing methodology to match the stature and weight of the surrogates used in the two published studies. Overall, the main trends observed in the three setups can be approached using the baseline model. Although the model morphing did not account for specific skeletal dimensions, it reduced some of the discrepancies between model response and reference for the drop test and flat plate impact. However, it had little effect on the pendulum test. In that case, the model response was in the corridor at low speed but above at higher speeds. Possible reasons for this difference should be further investigated.

Keywords: Anthropometry; Finite elements; Human body model; Scalable model; Side impact.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources