Morphology discrimination and ICD programming: Can we do better?
- PMID: 32337770
- DOI: 10.1111/jce.14519
Morphology discrimination and ICD programming: Can we do better?
Keywords: ICD; defibrillator; discriminators; morphology.
Comment on
-
Electrogram morphology discriminators in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: A comparative evaluation.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Jun;31(6):1493-1506. doi: 10.1111/jce.14518. Epub 2020 May 7. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020. PMID: 32333433
References
REFERENCES
-
- Daubert JP, Zareba W, Cannom DS, et al. Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks in MADIT II. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1357-1365.
-
- Wilkoff BL, Fauchier L, Stiles MK, et al. 2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:e50-e86.
-
- Stiles MK, Fauchier L, Morillo CA, Wilkoff BL. 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS focused update to 2015 expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing. J Arrhythm. 2019;35(3):485-493. https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12178
-
- Sedláček K, Ruwald AC, Kutyifa V, et al. The effect of ICD programming on inappropriate and appropriate ICD therapies in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy: the MADIT-RIT trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:424-433.
-
- Frontera A, Strik M, Eschalier R, et al. Electrogram morphology discriminators in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a comparative evaluation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. In press.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical