Three-dimensional biofilm image reconstruction for assessing structural parameters
- PMID: 32339263
- DOI: 10.1002/bit.27363
Three-dimensional biofilm image reconstruction for assessing structural parameters
Abstract
Parameters representing three-dimensional (3D) biofilm structure are quantified from confocal laser-scanning microscope (CLSM) images. These 3D parameters describe the distribution of biomass pixels within the space occupied by a biofilm; however, they lack a direct connection to biofilm activity. As a result, researchers choose a handful of parameters without there being a consensus on a standard set of parameters. We hypothesized that a select 3D parameter set could be used to reconstruct a biofilm image and that the reconstructed and original biofilm images would have similar activities. To test this hypothesis, an algorithm was developed to reconstruct a biofilm image with parameters identical to those of the original CLSM image. We introduced an objective method to assess the reconstruction algorithm by comparing the activities of the original and reconstructed biofilm images. We found that biofilm images with identical structural parameters showed nearly identical activities and substrate concentration profiles. This implies that the set containing all common structural parameters can successfully describe biofilm structure. This finding is significant, as it opens the door to the next step, of finding a smaller standard set of biofilm structural parameters that can be used to compare biofilm structure.
Keywords: biofilm; image; parameters; reconstruction; structure.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Beyenal, H., Donovan, C., Lewandowski, Z., & Harkin, G. (2004). Three-dimensional biofilm structure quantification. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 59(3), 395-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2004.08.003
-
- Costerton, J. W., Cheng, K. J., Geesey, G. G., Ladd, T. I., Nickel, J. C., Dasgupta, M., & Marrie, T. J. (1987). Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Annual Review of Microbiology, 41, 435-464. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.41.100187.002251
-
- Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999). Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections. Science, 284(5418), 1318-1322. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.1318
-
- Costerton, W., Veeh, R., Shirtliff, M., Pasmore, M., Post, C., & Ehrlich, G. (2007). The application of biofilm science to the study and control of chronic bacterial infections (vol 112, 1466, 2003). Journal of Clinical Investigation, 117(1), 278. https://doi.org/10.1172/Jci20365c1
-
- Daims, H., Lucker, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). daime, a novel image analysis program for microbial ecology and biofilm research. Environmental Microbiology, 8(2), 200-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00880.x
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
