Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep:253:92-99.
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.046. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

Intelligent, Autonomous Machines in Surgery

Affiliations

Intelligent, Autonomous Machines in Surgery

Tyler J Loftus et al. J Surg Res. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Surgeons perform two primary tasks: operating and engaging patients and caregivers in shared decision-making. Human dexterity and decision-making are biologically limited. Intelligent, autonomous machines have the potential to augment or replace surgeons. Rather than regarding this possibility with denial, ire, or indifference, surgeons should understand and steer these technologies. Closer examination of surgical innovations and lessons learned from the automotive industry can inform this process. Innovations in minimally invasive surgery and surgical decision-making follow classic S-shaped curves with three phases: (1) introduction of a new technology, (2) achievement of a performance advantage relative to existing standards, and (3) arrival at a performance plateau, followed by replacement with an innovation featuring greater machine autonomy and less human influence. There is currently no level I evidence demonstrating improved patient outcomes using intelligent, autonomous machines for performing operations or surgical decision-making tasks. History suggests that if such evidence emerges and if the machines are cost effective, then they will augment or replace humans, initially for simple, common, rote tasks under close human supervision and later for complex tasks with minimal human supervision. This process poses ethical challenges in assigning liability for errors, matching decisions to patient values, and displacing human workers, but may allow surgeons to spend less time gathering and analyzing data and more time interacting with patients and tending to urgent, critical-and potentially more valuable-aspects of patient care. Surgeons should steer these technologies toward optimal patient care and net social benefit using the uniquely human traits of creativity, altruism, and moral deliberation.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Automation; Innovation; Machine learning; Surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Past, present, and projected future innovations in surgery use progressively more computer autonomy and less human influence, augmenting or replacing previous methods once a cost-effective performance advantage is achieved with a new innovation.

References

    1. Healey MA, Shackford SR, Osler TM, Rogers FB, Burns E. Complications in surgical patients. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 611–617; discussion 617–618. - PubMed
    1. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O’Reilly A, et al. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1434–1442. - PubMed
    1. Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1138–1144. - PubMed
    1. Furuya S, Tominaga K, Miyazaki F, Altenmuller E. Losing dexterity: patterns of impaired coordination of finger movements in musician’s dystonia. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 13360. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carmeli E, Patish H, Coleman R. The aging hand. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003; 58: 146–152. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms