Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Nov;127(12):1528-1535.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16279. Epub 2020 May 31.

Laparoscopic ablation or excision with helium thermal coagulator versus electrodiathermy for the treatment of mild-to-moderate endometriosis: randomised controlled trial

G Misra  1 , J Sim  2 , Z El-Gizawy  1 , K Watts  3 , S Jerreat  1 , T Coia  1 , J Ritchie  1 , S O'Brien  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Laparoscopic ablation or excision with helium thermal coagulator versus electrodiathermy for the treatment of mild-to-moderate endometriosis: randomised controlled trial

G Misra et al. BJOG. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To compare electrodiathermy with helium thermal coagulation in laparoscopic treatment of mild-to-moderate endometriosis.

Design: Parallel-group randomised controlled trial.

Setting: A UK endometriosis centre.

Population: Non-pregnant women aged 16-50 years with a clinical diagnosis of mild-to-moderate endometriosis.

Methods: If mild or moderate endometriosis was confirmed at laparoscopy, women were randomised to laparoscopic treatment with electrodiathermy or helium thermal coagulator.

Main outcome measures: Cyclical pain and dyspareunia (rated on a 100-mm visual analogue scale, VAS), quality of life at baseline and at 6, 12 and 36 weeks following surgery, operative blood loss and surgical complications.

Results: A total of 192 women were randomised. Of these, 155 (81%) completed the primary outcome point at 12 weeks. In an intention-to-treat analysis, VAS scores for cyclical pain were significantly lower in the electrodiathermy group compared with the helium group at 12 weeks (mean difference, 9.43 mm; 95% CI 0.46, 18.40 mm; P = 0.039) and across all time points (mean difference, 10.13 mm; 95% CI 3.48, 16.78 mm; P = 0.003). A significant difference in dyspareunia also favoured electrodiathermy at 12 weeks (mean difference, 11.66 mm; 95% CI 1.39, 21.93 mm; P = 0.026). These effects were smaller than the proposed minimum important difference of 18.00 mm, however. Differences in some aspects of quality of life favoured electrodiathermy. There was no significant difference in operative blood loss (fold-change with helium as reference, 1.43; 95% CI 0.96, 2.15; P = 0.081).

Conclusions: Although electrodiathermy was statistically superior to helium ablation in reducing cyclical pain and dyspareunia, these effects may be too small to be clinically significant.

Tweetable abstract: Helium coagulation is not superior to electrodiathermy in laparoscopic treatment of mild-to-moderate endometriosis.

Keywords: Endometriosis; laparoscopic surgery; pelvic pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Vercellini P, Viganò P, Somigliana E, Fedele L. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2014;10:261-75.
    1. Rogers PAW, D'Hooghe TM, Fazleabas A, Gargett CE, Giudice LC, Montgomery GW, et al. Priorities for endometriosis research: recommendations from an international consensus workshop. Reprod Sci 2009;16:335-46.
    1. Wykes CB, Clark TJ, Khan KS. Accuracy of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic quantitative review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;111:1204-12.
    1. Hadfield R, Mardon H, Barlow D, Kennedy S. Delay in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a survey of women from the USA and the UK. Hum Reprod 1996;11:878-80.
    1. Ballard K, Lowton K, Wright J. What's the delay? A qualitative study of women's experiences of reaching a diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2006;86:1296-301.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources