Intermediate-term outcomes of aortic valve replacement using a bioprosthesis with a novel tissue
- PMID: 32340804
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.01.095
Intermediate-term outcomes of aortic valve replacement using a bioprosthesis with a novel tissue
Abstract
Objectives: The COMMENCE trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an aortic bioprosthesis with novel RESILIA tissue (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif). Reports of early noncalcific valve failure resulting from thrombosis or leaflet tears in other valves warrant careful evaluation of early valve performance.
Methods: Patients underwent clinically indicated surgical aortic valve replacement with the Edwards Pericardial Aortic Bioprosthesis, Model 11000A (Edwards Lifesciences) in a prospective, multinational, multicenter (n = 27), single-arm, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial. Events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee; echocardiograms were analyzed by an independent core laboratory.
Results: Between January 2013 and March 2016, 689 patients received the study valve. Mean age was 67.0 ± 11.6 years. Mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality was 2.0% ± 1.8%. Follow-up duration was 3.7 ± 1.2 years, with a total of 2533 patient years of follow-up and a median follow-up of 4 years. Early all-cause mortality was 1.2%, thromboembolism 2.3%, all bleeding 1.0%, and major paravalvular leak 0.1%. One- and 4-year actuarial freedom from all-cause mortality was 97.7% (95% confidence interval, 96.5%-98.8%) and 91.9% (95% confidence interval, 89.7%-94.1%), respectively. At 4 years, New York Heart Association functional class improved compared with baseline in 63.0%, effective orifice area was 1.5 ± 0.5 cm2, and mean gradient was 11.0 ± 5.6 mm Hg. Freedom from moderate or greater transvalvular insufficiency was 99.7%. There were no events of structural valve deterioration.
Conclusions: Safety and hemodynamic performance of this aortic bioprosthesis with RESILIA tissue at 4 years are favorable. This novel tissue does not appear to result in unexpected early thrombosis events or noncalcific structural valve deterioration.
Keywords: aortic valve replacement, bioprosthetic valve, RESILIA, tissue.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Comment in
-
Commentary: The end of the beginning?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Nov;162(5):1489-1490. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.039. Epub 2020 Feb 19. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 32164948 No abstract available.
-
Commentary: The future of a former valve: Inspiring, resilient, or both?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Nov;162(5):1487-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.055. Epub 2020 Feb 21. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 32199658 No abstract available.
-
Commentary: Surgical aortic valve bioprostheses are still around and looking good.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Nov;162(5):1486-1487. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.026. Epub 2020 Feb 14. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 32201000 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical