Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;22(7):1206-1214.
doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0791-8. Epub 2020 Apr 28.

The prevalence of genetic diagnoses in fetuses with severe congenital heart defects

Affiliations

The prevalence of genetic diagnoses in fetuses with severe congenital heart defects

Amber E L van Nisselrooij et al. Genet Med. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: Congenital heart defects (CHD) are associated with genetic syndromes. Rapid aneuploidy testing and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) are standard care in fetal CHD. Many genetic syndromes remain undetected with these tests. This cohort study aims to estimate the frequency of causal genetic variants, in particular structural chromosome abnormalities and sequence variants, in fetuses with severe CHD at mid-gestation, to aid prenatal counselling.

Methods: Fetuses with severe CHD were extracted from the PRECOR registry (2012-2016). We evaluated pre- and postnatal genetic testing results retrospectively to estimate the frequency of genetic diagnoses in general, as well as for specific CHDs.

Results: 919 fetuses with severe CHD were identified. After exclusion of 211 cases with aneuploidy, a genetic diagnosis was found in 15.7% (111/708). These comprised copy number variants in 9.9% (70/708). In 4.5% (41/708) sequence variants were found that would have remained undetected with CMA. Interrupted aortic arch, pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect and atrioventricular septal defect were most commonly associated with a genetic diagnosis.

Conclusion: In case of normal CMA results, parents should be offered exome sequencing sequentially, if time allows for it, especially if the CHD is accompanied by other structural malformations due to the large variety in genetic syndromes.

Keywords: chromosome microarray analysis; congenital heart defects; exome sequencing; genetic syndrome; prenatal counseling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Flow chart case selection.
*Adjusted prevalence after exclusion of aneuploidy cases. CHD congenital heart defect, CNV copy number variant, T21 trisomy 21, T18 trisomy 18, T13 trisomy 13.

Comment in

References

    1. van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2241–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leirgul E, Fomina T, Brodwall K, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart defects in Norway 1994-2009-a nationwide study. Am Heart J. 2014;168:956–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.07.030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoang TT, Goldmuntz E, Roberts AE, et al. The Congenital Heart Disease Genetic Network Study: Cohort description. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0191319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191319. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zaidi S, Brueckner M. Genetics and Genomics of Congenital Heart Disease. Circ Res. 2017;120:923–40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309140. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Song MS, Hu A, Dyamenahalli U, et al. Extracardiac lesions and chromosomal abnormalities associated with major fetal heart defects: comparison of intrauterine, postnatal and postmortem diagnoses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:552–9. doi: 10.1002/uog.6309. - DOI - PubMed