Evaluating Shared Decision Making in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Counseling Using Objective Structured Clinical Examinations
- PMID: 32342013
- PMCID: PMC7182044
- DOI: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10891
Evaluating Shared Decision Making in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Counseling Using Objective Structured Clinical Examinations
Abstract
Introduction: Although shared decision making (SDM) is optimal for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) counseling, resources to assess residents' clinical competency and communication skills are lacking. We addressed this gap by developing and testing an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to evaluate whether learners were able to use SDM in TOLAC counseling.
Methods: We created three simulation scenarios with increasing complexity to assess the skills of residents in their first, second, or third postgraduate year in using SDM in TOLAC counseling. All cases involved a standardized patient requesting a TOLAC consultation. Residents were provided with a medical history and instructed to counsel and develop a care plan. A 10-item scoring rubric was used, and each item was rated 0 (absent), 1 (partial), or 2 (complete). Three coders independently rated the encounters; discrepancies were resolved by consensus.
Results: Over 3 years, 39 residents participated in 60 OSCE encounters. The majority provided complete discussions of the clinical issue (93%), chances of success (72%), and maternal and fetal risks (100% and 85%, respectively) but obtained partial assessments of understanding (78%). Discussions of benefits were typically absent, with the exception of the maternal benefits (47%). More than 40% of residents did not discuss the patient's goals, 53% lacked discussion of uncertainties related to TOLAC, and half failed to explore the patient's preference, with most deferring a decision to a future encounter.
Discussion: Residents consistently discussed diagnosis, prognosis, and maternal risks yet infrequently addressed goals and preferences-two critical elements of SDM.
Keywords: Birth Counseling; Case-Based Learning; Clinical Skills Assessment/OSCEs; Communication Skills; OB/GYN; Resident Training; Shared Decision Making; Simulation; Standardized Patient; TOLAC; Trial of Labor; VBAC; Vaginal Birth After Cesarean.
Copyright © 2020 Tucker Edmonds et al.
Conflict of interest statement
None to report.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013. PMID: 23810846 Review.
-
Evaluating shared decision-making in periviable counseling using objective structured clinical examinations.J Perinatol. 2019 Jun;39(6):857-865. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0366-1. Epub 2019 Apr 3. J Perinatol. 2019. PMID: 30944399
-
The relationship between personal knowledge and decision self-efficacy in choosing trial of labor after cesarean.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 May-Jun;59(3):246-53. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12173. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014. PMID: 24850282
-
The Effect of Evidence-Based Scripted Midwifery Counseling on Women's Choices About Mode of Birth After a Previous Cesarean.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Sep;61(5):613-620. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12466. Epub 2016 Jul 18. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016. PMID: 27428683
-
Counseling women with a previous cesarean birth: toward a shared decision-making partnership.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 May-Jun;59(3):237-45. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12177. Epub 2014 Apr 28. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014. PMID: 24773588 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating Shared Decision-Making in Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling Using Objective Structured Clinical Examinations.Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022 Dec 26;3(1):1029-1036. doi: 10.1089/whr.2022.0067. eCollection 2022. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022. PMID: 36636315 Free PMC article.
-
Development and testing of the shared decision-making attitudes scale among nurses in Taiwan: a cross-sectional scale development study.BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 14;11(9):e044733. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044733. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34521656 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, et al.. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(5):1656-1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.04.002 - PubMed
-
- Mercer BM, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al.. Labor outcomes with increasing number of prior vaginal births after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(2):285-291. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816102b9 - PubMed
-
- Zia S, Rafique M. Intra-operative complications increase with successive number of cesarean sections: myth or fact? Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014;57(3):187-192. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2014.57.3.187 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Cook JR, Jarvis S, Knight M, Dhanjal MK. Multiple repeat caesarean section in the UK: incidence and consequences to mother and child. A national, prospective, cohort study. BJOG. 2013;120(1):85-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12010 - PubMed
-
- Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al; for the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581-2589. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040405 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous