Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Sep;21(9):e610-e616.
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002359.

How Do Children Die in PICUs Nowadays? A Multicenter Study From Spain

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

How Do Children Die in PICUs Nowadays? A Multicenter Study From Spain

Carme Agra-Tuñas et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe how children currently die in Spanish PICUs, their epidemiologic characteristics and clinical diagnoses.

Design: Prospective multicenter observational study.

Setting: Eighteen PICUs participating in the MOdos de Morir en UCI Pediátrica-2 (MOMUCI-2) study in Spain.

Patients: Children 1 to 16 years old who died in PICU during 2017 and 2018.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: During the 2-year study period, 250 deaths were recorded. Seventy-three children (29.3%) were younger than 1 year, 131 (52.6%) were between 1 and 12 years old, and 45 (18.1%) were older than 12. One-hundred eighty patients (72%) suffered from an underlying chronic disease, 54 (21.6%) had been admitted to PICU in the past 6 months, and 71 (28.4%) were severely disabled upon admission. Deaths occurred more frequently on the afternoon-night shift (62%) after a median PICU length of stay of 3 days (1-12 d). Nearly half of the patients died (48.8%) after life-sustaining treatment limitation, 71 died (28.4%) despite receiving life-sustaining therapies and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and 57 (22.8%) were declared brain dead. The most frequent type of life-sustaining treatment limitation was the withdrawal of mechanical ventilation (20.8%), followed by noninitiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (18%) and withdrawal of vasoactive drugs (13.7%). Life-sustaining treatment limitation was significantly more frequent in patients with an underlying neurologic-neuromuscular disease, respiratory disease as the cause of admission, a previous admission to PICU in the past 6 months, and severe disability. Multivariate analyses indicated that life-sustaining treatment limitation, chronicity, and poor Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score were closely related.

Conclusions: Currently, nearly half of the deaths in Spanish PICUs occur after the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments. These children are more likely to have had previous admissions to the PICU, be severely disabled or to suffer from chronic diseases. Healthcare professionals who treat critically ill children ought to be aware of this situation and should therefore be prepared and trained to provide the best end-of-life care possible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Meert KL, Keele L, Morrison W, et al. End-of-life practices among tertiary care pediatric intensive care units in the U.S. A multicenter study. Ped Crit Care Med 2015; 16:e231–e238
    1. Sands R, Manning JC, Vyas H, et al. Characteristics of deaths in paediatric intensive care: A 10-year study. Nurs Crit Care 2009; 14:235–240
    1. Trenchs V, Cambra F, Palomeque A, et al. Limitación terapéutica en cuidados intensivos. An Esp Pediatr (Barc) 2002; 57:511–517
    1. Launes C, Cambra FJ, Jordán I, et al. Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments: An 8-yr retrospective review in a Spanish pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011; 12:e383–e385
    1. Trowbridge A, Walter JK, McConathey E, et al. Modes of death within a children’s hospital. Pediatrics 2018; 142:e20174182

Publication types