Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 24;20(8):2421.
doi: 10.3390/s20082421.

Perception of a Haptic Stimulus Presented Under the Foot Under Workload

Affiliations

Perception of a Haptic Stimulus Presented Under the Foot Under Workload

Landry Delphin Chapwouo Tchakoute et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

It is clear that the haptic channel can be exploited as a communication medium for several tasks of everyday life. Here we investigated whether such communication can be altered in a cognitive load situation. We studied the perception of a vibrotactile stimulus presented under the foot when the attention is loaded by another task (cognitive load). The results demonstrated a significant influence of workload on the perception of the vibrotactile stimulus. Overall, we observed that the average score in the single-task (at rest) condition was greater than the overall mean score in the dual-task conditions (counting forwards, counting backwards, and walking). The walking task was the task that most influenced the perception of the vibrotactile stimulus presented under the foot.

Keywords: haptic communication; haptic interfaces; haptic stimulus; haptics under workload; haptics via foot; vibrotactile stimulus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The wearable device worn on the left foot with a strap to hold the haptuator. (I) The device component used for the experiment. The haptuator is located under the arch of the second toe fixed by the black strap. (II) The electronic diagram of the device showing how the components are joined together in order to deliver the vibrotactile stimulus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Score mean perception of each condition (with mean value inside the bars).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overall score mean perception of single task compared to dual task (with mean value inside the bars).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Box plot of score perception between conditions: at rest; counting forwards (CF); counting backwards (CB); and walking.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Normality test results: residual plots of conditions at rest, counting forward (CF), counting backward (CB), and walking.

References

    1. Brewster S., Chohan F., Brown L. Tactile feedback for mobile interactions; Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (HI ’07); San Jose, CA, USA. 28 April–3 May 2007.
    1. Lederman S.J., Klatzky R.L. Haptic perception: A tutorial. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2009;71:1439–1459. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.7.1439. - DOI - PubMed
    1. MacLean K.E. Haptic Interaction Design for Everyday Interfaces. Rev. Hum. Factors Ergon. 2008;4:149–194. doi: 10.1518/155723408X342826. - DOI
    1. Tchakouté L.D.C., Gagnon D., Menelas B.-A.J. Use of tactons to communicate a risk level through an enactive shoe. J. Multimodal User Interfaces. 2018;12:41–53. doi: 10.1007/s12193-018-0260-8. - DOI
    1. Hoggan E., Brewster S. CHI ’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’07) Association for Computing Machinery; New York, NY, USA: 2007. New parameters for tacton design; pp. 2417–2422.

LinkOut - more resources