Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 28;20(1):574.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08682-w.

Communication of children's weight status: what is effective and what are the children's and parents' experiences and preferences? A mixed methods systematic review

H Ames  1 , A Mosdøl  2 , N Blaasvær  2 , H Nøkleby  2 , R C Berg  2 , L J Langøien  2
Affiliations

Communication of children's weight status: what is effective and what are the children's and parents' experiences and preferences? A mixed methods systematic review

H Ames et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Early intervention and conversation about a child's weight may offer an important chance of success in reducing weight and implementing a healthier lifestyle. This review explores the most effective ways to notify parents and children about the child's weight as well as their preferences and experiences around weight notification.

Methods: We systematically searched nine databases for relevant primary research. Records were independently screened by two authors. We extracted data into a form designed for this review. Effect data was analysed using narrative synthesis and qualitative data using a best-fit framework synthesis. We assessed our confidence in the evidence using GRADE and GRADE-CERQual.

Results: Studies of effect found that the format of feedback made little or no difference in parents attending further treatment, recognising their child as overweight or obese, reactions to the way the weight notification is given, motivation for lifestyle change, understanding how to reduce the risk of overweight, or taking any action. However, parents receiving feedback with motivational interviewing have somewhat greater satisfaction with the way the healthcare provider supports them. Qualitative studies found that parents had clear preferences for the format, timing, content and amount of information they wanted to receive in relation to both the weighing process and weight notification. They also had clear preferences for how they wanted health care providers to interact and communicate with them and their children. Both parents and children often felt that they were not receiving enough information and worried about how their results would be kept private. Many parents experienced an emotional response when told about their child's weight ranging from positive, disbelief and negative feelings. Those who reacted with disbelief or negatively were less likely to accept their child's weight status and/or act upon the notification letter. No studies reported results for children who were underweight.

Conclusions: Based on these qualitative results people working with weight assessment and notification programs should consider parents' preferences when developing feedback formats, considering the mode of feedback they are going to use and provide parents and children with tailored feedback and personalized follow up once a child is identified as overweight or obese.

Keywords: Adolescents; Children; Communication; Parents; Systematic review; Weight; Weight assessment; Weight notification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This mixed methods systematic review was commissioned by The Norwegian Directorate of Health to contribute to a guidelines process. The Norwegian Directorate of Health was consulted throughout the process to ensure that the review question, population, setting etc. was correct to answer their needs but was not involved in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript. The work was carried out at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart for search results and handling of references
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abarca-Gómez L, Abdeen ZA, Hamid ZA, Abu-Rmeileh NM, Acosta-Cazares B, Acuin C, et al. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128· 9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2017;390(10113):2627–2642. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cole TJ, Flegal KM, Nicholls D, Jackson AA. Body mass index cut offs to define thinness in children and adolescents: international survey. Bmj. 2007;335(7612):194. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39238.399444.55. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Who EC. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet (London, England) 2004;363(9403):157. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. CDC. Defining Childhood Obesity; BMI for Children and Teens 2016 [Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/defining.html?s_cid=cs_1036.
    1. Wijnhoven TM, van Raaij JM, Spinelli A, Starc G, Hassapidou M, Spiroski I, et al. WHO European childhood obesity surveillance initiative: body mass index and level of overweight among 6–9-year-old children from school year 2007/2008 to school year 2009/2010. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):806. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-806. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding