Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 1;105(3):608-619.
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003287.

The Preimplantation Psychosocial Evaluation and Prediction of Clinical Outcomes During Mechanical Circulatory Support: What Information Is Most Prognostic?

Mary Amanda Dew  1   2   3   4   5 , Jennifer C Hollenberger  6   7 , Laura L Obregon  8   9 , Gavin W Hickey  9   10 , Christopher M Sciortino  9   11 , Kathleen L Lockard  9 , Nicole M Kunz  9 , Michael A Mathier  9   10 , Ravi N Ramani  9   10 , Arman Kilic  9   11 , Dennis M McNamara  9   10 , Marc A Simon  9   10 , Mary E Keebler  9   10 , Robert L Kormos  9   11
Affiliations

The Preimplantation Psychosocial Evaluation and Prediction of Clinical Outcomes During Mechanical Circulatory Support: What Information Is Most Prognostic?

Mary Amanda Dew et al. Transplantation. .

Abstract

Background: Psychosocial evaluations are required for long-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) candidates, no matter whether MCS will be destination therapy (DT) or a bridge to heart transplantation. Although guidelines specify psychosocial contraindications to MCS, there is no comprehensive examination of which psychosocial evaluation domains are most prognostic for clinical outcomes. We evaluated whether overall psychosocial risk, determined across all psychosocial domains, predicted outcomes, and which specific domains appeared responsible for any effects.

Methods: A single-site retrospective analysis was performed for adults receiving MCS between April 2004 and December 2017. Using an established rating system, we coded psychosocial evaluations to identify patients at low, moderate, or high overall risk. We similarly determined risk within each of 10 individual psychosocial domains. Multivariable analyses evaluated whether psychosocial risk predicted clinical decisions about MCS use (DT versus bridge), and postimplantation mortality, transplantation, rehospitalization, MCS pump exchange, and standardly defined adverse medical events (AEs).

Results: In 241 MCS recipients, greater overall psychosocial risk increased the likelihood of a DT decision (odds ratio, 1.76; P = 0.017); and postimplantation pump exchange and occurrence of AEs (hazard ratios [HRs] ≥ 1.25; P ≤ 0.042). The individual AEs most strongly predicted were cardiac arrhythmias and device malfunctions (HRs ≥ 1.39; P ≤ 0.032). The specific psychosocial domains predicting at least 1 study outcome were mental health problem severity, poorer medical adherence, and substance use (odds ratios and HRs ≥ 1.32; P ≤ 0.010).

Conclusions: The psychosocial evaluation predicts not only clinical decisions about MCS use (DT versus bridge) but important postimplantation outcomes. Strategies to address psychosocial risk factors before or soon after implantation may help to reduce postimplantation clinical risks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.K. is on the Medical Advisory Board, Medtronic, Inc. M.A.S. has received research support from Novartis and Aadi Bioscience. He has served as a consultant to Acceleron Pharma, Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Complexa, Inc., and United Therapeutics. M.E.K. is on the Medical Advisory Board, Medtronic, Inc., and is a consultant to Abbott Laboratories, Inc. R.L.K. is now employed by Abbott Laboratories, Inc. The work described herein was completed while he was at the University of Pittsburgh. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Dew MA, DiMartini AF, Dobbels F, et al. The 2018 ISHLT/APM/AST/ICCAC/STSW recommendations for the psychosocial evaluation of adult cardiothoracic transplant candidates and candidates for long-term mechanical circulatory support. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018; 37:803–823. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2018.03.005 - DOI
    1. Feldman D, Pamboukian SV, Teuteberg JJ, et al.; International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: executive summary. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013; 32:157–187. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2012.09.013 - DOI
    1. Potapov EV, Antonides C, Crespo-Leiro MG, et al. 2019 EACTS expert consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 56:230–270. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezz098 - DOI
    1. Bruce CR, Delgado E, Kostick K, et al. Ventricular assist devices: a review of psychosocial risk factors and their impact on outcomes. J Card Fail. 2014; 20:996–1003. doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2014.09.006 - DOI
    1. Bui QM, Allen LA, LeMond L, et al. Psychosocial evaluation of candidates for heart transplant and ventricular assist devices: beyond the current consensus. Circ Heart Fail. 2019; 12:e006058. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006058 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources