Management and outcomes of wartime cervical carotid artery injury
- PMID: 32345900
- DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002755
Management and outcomes of wartime cervical carotid artery injury
Abstract
Background: Cervical carotid artery injuries entail high morbidity and mortality and are technically challenging to repair. This retrospective study describes the management and outcomes of cervical carotid injuries sustained during the recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Methods: The Department of Defense Trauma Registry was queried to identify US military personnel who sustained battle-related cervical carotid injury between January 2002 and December 2015. Retrospective chart reviews of the military Electronic Health Record were performed on patients identified. Demographics, injury characteristics, surgical management, and outcomes were reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed to identify associations between injury and management factors, as well as stroke and mortality.
Results: In total, 67 patients (100% male; age, 25 ± 7 years) were identified with cervical carotid artery injuries. Fifty-six patients (84%) sustained a common carotid artery (CCA) or internal carotid artery (ICA) injury, and 11 patients (16%) had an isolated external carotid artery (ECA) injury. The anatomic distribution of injury was as follows: CCA, 26 (38.8%); ICA, 24 (35.8%); CCA and ICA 2 (3%); ICA and ECA 3 (4.5%); and CCA, ICA, and ECA 1 (1.5%). Of the 56 CCA or ICA injuries, 39 underwent vascular repair, 9 (16%) were managed with ligation, 1 was treated with a temporary vascular shunt but succumbed to injuries before vascular repair, and 7 (13%) were treated nonoperatively. Seven (23%) of 30 ICA injuries were ligated compared with 2 (7.7%) of 26 injuries isolated to the CCA (p = 0.02). Compared with repair, ligation of the CCA/ICA was associated with a higher rate of stroke (89% vs. 33%, p = 0.003) and increased mortality without statistical significance (22% vs. 10%, p = 0.3). Every patient who underwent ICA ligation had a stroke (7/7). There was no difference in Injury Severity Score between the ligation and repair groups (23.8 ± 10.6 vs. 24.7 ± 13.4, p = 0.9). At a mean follow-up of 34.5 months, 10 of 17 stroke survivors had permanent neurologic deficits.
Conclusion: In modern combat, penetrating injuries involving the cervical carotid arteries are relatively infrequent. In this experience, isolated ICA injuries were three times more likely to be ligated than those involving the CCA. As a surgical maneuver, ICA ligation resulted in stroke in all cases.
Level of evidence: Retrospective cohort analysis, level III.
Similar articles
-
A multi-registry analysis of military and civilian penetrating cervical carotid artery injury.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Aug 1;91(2S Suppl 2):S226-S232. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003296. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021. PMID: 34039922
-
Risk factors for stroke in penetrating cerebrovascular injuries.J Vasc Surg. 2024 Oct;80(4):1064-1070. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.061. Epub 2024 Jun 5. J Vasc Surg. 2024. PMID: 38849104
-
Outcomes following penetrating neck injury during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts: A comparison of treatment at US and United Kingdom medical treatment facilities.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 May;88(5):696-703. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002625. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020. PMID: 32068717 Free PMC article.
-
Endovascular management of internal carotid artery injuries secondary to endonasal surgery: case series and review of the literature.J Neurosurg. 2016 Nov;125(5):1256-1276. doi: 10.3171/2015.6.JNS142483. Epub 2016 Jan 15. J Neurosurg. 2016. PMID: 26771847 Review.
-
Management of penetrating injuries to carotid artery.World J Surg. 2001 Aug;25(8):1028-35. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0055-y. World J Surg. 2001. PMID: 11571968 Review.
Cited by
-
Damage control in penetrating carotid artery trauma: changing a 100-year paradigm.Colomb Med (Cali). 2021 Jun 30;52(2):e4054807. doi: 10.25100/cm.v52i2.4807. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun. Colomb Med (Cali). 2021. PMID: 34908620 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prognostic factors for femoropopliteal vascular injuries: surgical decisions matter.J Vasc Bras. 2023 Nov 13;22:e20230050. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300502. eCollection 2023. J Vasc Bras. 2023. PMID: 38021276 Free PMC article.
-
Brazilian guidelines on diagnosis and management of traumatic vascular injuries.J Vasc Bras. 2023 Oct 30;22:e20230042. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300422. eCollection 2023. J Vasc Bras. 2023. PMID: 38021277 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Debakey ME, Simeone FA. Battle injuries of the arteries in World War II: an analysis of 2,471 cases. Ann Surg. 1946;123:534–579.
-
- Hughes CW. Arterial repair during the Korean War. Ann Surg. 1958;147:555–561.
-
- Rich NM, Baugh JH, Hughes CW. Acute arterial injuries in Vietnam: 1,000 cases. Appl Radiat Isotopes. 1970;10:359–369.
-
- White JM, Stannard A, Burkhardt GE, Eastridge BJ, Blackbourne LH, Rasmussen TE. The epidemiology of vascular injury in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Ann Surg. 2011;253:1184–1189.
-
- Patel JA, White JM, White PW, Rich NM, Rasmussen TE. A contemporary, 7-year analysis of vascular injury from the war in Afghanistan. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68:1872–1879.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous