Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun;28(2):41-48.
doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000265.

Graft Selection in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Affiliations
Review

Graft Selection in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Kenneth M Lin et al. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is often indicated to restore functional stability and prevent early degeneration of the knee joint, as there is little biological healing capacity of the native ACL. Although a reconstructed ACL does not fully restore the original structure or biomechanics properties of the native ACL, the graft used for reconstruction must not only have structural and mechanical properties that closely resemble those of the native ligament, it must also have minimal antigenicity and enough biological potential to incorporate into host bone. There are several considerations in graft selection: autograft versus allograft, and soft tissue grafts versus grafts with bone plugs. Commonly used grafts include bone-patella tendon-bone, hamstring, and quadriceps; among allografts, options further include tibias anterior and posterior, Achilles, an peroneal tendons. Optimal graft selection is not only dependent on graft properties, but perhaps more importantly on patient characteristics and expectations. The purpose of this review is to summarize the relevant biological, biomechancial, and clinical data regarding various graft types and to provide a basic framework for graft selection in ACL reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Herzog MM, Marshall SW, Lund JL, et al. Trends in incidence of ACL reconstruction and concomitant procedures among commercially insured individuals in the United States, 2002-2014. Sports Health. 2018;10:523–531.
    1. Beck NA, Lawrence JTR, Nordin JD, et al. ACL tears in school-aged children and adolescents over 20 years. Pediatrics. 2017;139:e20161877.
    1. Sanders TL, Pareek A, Kremers HM, et al. Long-term follow-up of isolated ACL tears treated without ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:493–500.
    1. Sanders TL, Kremers HM, Bryan AJ, et al. Is anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction effective in preventing secondary meniscal tears and osteoarthritis? Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:1699–1707.
    1. Galatz LM, Gerstenfeld L, Heber-Katz E, et al. Tendon regeneration and scar formation: the concept of scarless healing. J Orthop Res. 2015;33:823–831.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources