Evolutionary integration of the frog cranium
- PMID: 32346857
- DOI: 10.1111/evo.13984
Evolutionary integration of the frog cranium
Abstract
Evolutionary integration (covariation) of traits has long fascinated biologists because of its potential to elucidate factors that have shaped morphological evolution. Studies of tetrapod crania have identified patterns of evolutionary integration that reflect functional or developmental interactions among traits, but no studies to date have sampled widely across the species-rich lissamphibian order Anura (frogs). Frogs exhibit a vast range of cranial morphologies, life history strategies, and ecologies. Here, using high-density morphometrics we capture cranial morphology for 172 anuran species, sampling every extant family. We quantify the pattern of evolutionary modularity in the frog skull and compare patterns in taxa with different life history modes. Evolutionary changes across the anuran cranium are highly modular, with a well-integrated "suspensorium" involved in feeding. This pattern is strikingly similar to that identified for caecilian and salamander crania, suggesting replication of patterns of evolutionary integration across Lissamphibia. Surprisingly, possession of a feeding larval stage has no notable influence on cranial integration across frogs. However, late-ossifying bones exhibit higher integration than early-ossifying bones. Finally, anuran cranial modules show diverse morphological disparities, supporting the hypothesis that modular variation allows mosaic evolution of the cranium, but we find no consistent relationship between degree of within-module integration and disparity.
Keywords: Frogs; cranial morphology; development; disparity; integration; morphometrics.
© 2020 The Authors. Evolution published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Society for the Study of Evolution.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Adams, D. C. 2014. A generalized K statistic for estimating phylogenetic signal from shape and other high-dimensional multivariate data. Syst. Biol. 63:685-697.
-
- Adams, D. C. 2016. Evaluating modularity in morphometric data: challenges with the RV coefficient and a new test measure. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7:565-572.
-
- Adams, D. C., and M. L. Collyer. 2019. Comparing the strength of modular signal, and evaluating alternative modular hypotheses, using covariance ratio effect sizes with morphometric data. Evolution 73:2352-2367.
-
- Adams, D. C., and E. Otárola-Castillo. 2013. geomorph: an R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4:393-399.
-
- Adams, D. C., M. L. Collyer, A. Kaliontzopoulou, and E. Sherratt. 2017. Geomorph: software for geometric morphometric analyses. R package version 3.1.3.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources