Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;9(12):4350-4359.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.3061. Epub 2020 Apr 28.

The underlying mechanisms of lorlatinib penetration across the blood-brain barrier and the distribution characteristics of lorlatinib in the brain

Affiliations

The underlying mechanisms of lorlatinib penetration across the blood-brain barrier and the distribution characteristics of lorlatinib in the brain

Wei Chen et al. Cancer Med. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To clarify the distribution of lorlatinib in the brain and elucidate the molecular mechanisms of lorlatinib penetration across the blood-brain barrier (BBB).

Methods: Cytological experiments were performed to investigate the growth inhibitory effect of lorlatinib on different cells (endothelial cells HUVEC, HMEC-1, and HCMEC/D3) and to investigate the protective effect of lorlatinib on neuronal cells after SH-SY5Y hypoxia/reoxygenation injury. Furthermore, rat brain tissue was sequenced, and the differentially expressed genes (secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), Claudin, ZO-1 and P-gp) in several different drug treatment groups were verified by Real-Time PCR. Lorlatinib brain distribution was predicted by physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK).

Results: Lorlatinib and crizotinib both had inhibitory effects on endothelial cells, however lorlatinib inhibited the growth of HCMEC/D3 more efficaciously than crizotinib. In the SH-SY5Y hypoxia model, lorlatinib had a greater protective effect on nerve cell damage caused by hypoxia and reoxygenation than crizotinib. The expression of SPP1, VEGF, TGF-β, and Claudin in brain tissue was significantly downregulated after lorlatinib administration, and the expression level of early growth transcription factor 1 (Egr-1) was significantly increased. The PBPK model successfully described lorlatinib concentrations in blood and brain tissue in the mouse model and gave a brain tissue partition coefficient of 0.7.

Conclusion: Lorlatinib can increase the permeability of the blood-brain barrier whereby we suggest its underlying working mechanism is related to downregulating SPP1, inhibiting VEGF, TGF-β, and Claudin subsequently reducing the number of tight junctions between BBB cells. Lorlatinib plays a protective role on injured nerve cells and does not change the amount of P-gp expression in brain tissue, which may be important for its ability to be efficacious across the BBB with a low incidence of resistance.

Keywords: Crizotinib; Lorlatinib; SPP1; blood-brain barrier.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicting interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Inhibitive effects on growth of endothelial cells
Figure 2
Figure 2
Neuroprotective effects of lorlatinib and crizotinib on hypoxia injury in SY5Y cells
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect on blood brain barrier (BBB) permeability
Figure 4
Figure 4
A, The number of differentially expressed genes in each group; B, Sequencing results of each administration group compared with that of the control group; C, The interaction pathway and target of SPP1 and the blood‐brain barrier. (C1: crizotinib single administration; C7: crizotinib repeated administration for 7 consecutive days; L1: lorlatinib single administration; L7: lorlatinib repeated administration for seven consecutive days; Con: control)
Figure 5
Figure 5
qPCR results of BBB‐related genes under the action of lorlatinib
Figure 6
Figure 6
qPCR results of BBB‐related genes under the action of lorlatinib and crizotinib
Figure 7
Figure 7
Concentration of lorlatinib in blood
Figure 8
Figure 8
Concentration of lorlatinib in brain
Figure 9
Figure 9
The underlying mechanisms of lorlatinib penetration across the blood‐brain barrier

References

    1. Didkowska J, Wojciechowska U, Mańczuk M, Łobaszewski J. Lung cancer epidemiology: contemporary and future challenges worldwide. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(8):150‐150. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Popper HH. Progression and metastasis of lung cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016;35(1):75‐91. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dempke WCM, Edvardsen K, Lu S, Reinmuth N, Reck M, Inoue A. Brain metastases in NSCLC‐are TKIs changing the treatment strategy? Anticancer Res. 2015;35(11):5797‐5806. - PubMed
    1. Gavrilovic IT, Posner JB. Brain metastases: epidemiology and pathophysiology. J Neurooncol. 2005;75(1):5‐14. - PubMed
    1. Yu X, Fan Y. Real‐world data on prognostic factors for overall survival in EGFR‐mutant non‐small‐cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases. J Cancer. 2019;10(15):3486‐3493. 10.7150/jca.30292. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms