Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;48(3):400-409.
doi: 10.1007/s11414-020-09700-w.

Increasing Engagement in Post-Withdrawal Management Services Through a Practice Bundle and Checklist

Affiliations

Increasing Engagement in Post-Withdrawal Management Services Through a Practice Bundle and Checklist

Todd Molfenter et al. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) who engage in post-withdrawal management (or detoxification) continuing care are more likely to remain drug free or sober and less likely to be incarcerated or die of overdose. Yet, just 21-35% of individuals receiving emergency withdrawal management services receive continuing care. This deficiency is occurring, while overdose rates are high, and limited evidence exists on how to improve this vital transition. To address this gap, withdrawal management service providers employed the LINK Care Transition Implementation System to improve withdrawal management to continuing care transition rates. This system integrates three evidence-based implementation science approaches: (a) practice bundle, (b) process checklist, and (c) standardized organizational change model. This integrated implementation approach improved withdrawal management to continuing care transition rates from 20 (baseline average) to 43% (post-intervention) in (n = 6) Wisconsin withdrawal management centers. This study provides insights into how to improve transitions to enhance SUD care and outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Carrier E, McNeely J, Lobach I, et al. Factors associated with frequent utilization of crisis substance use detoxification services. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 2011;30(2):116–122. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Specka M, Buchholz A, Kuhlmann T, et al. Prediction of the outcome of inpatient opiate detoxification treatment: Results from a multicenter study. European Addiction Research. 2011;17(4):178–184. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Stein BD, Kogan JN, Sorbero M. Substance abuse detoxification and residential treatment among Medicaid-enrolled adults: Rates and duration of subsequent treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2009;104(1–2):100–106. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Clark RE, Samnaliev M, McGovern MP. Impact of substance disorders on medical expenditures for Medicaid beneficiaries with behavioral health disorders. Psychiatric Services (Washington, DC). 2009;60(1):35–42. - DOI
    1. Marlatt GA, George WH. Relapse prevention: Introduction and overview of the model. British Journal of Addiction. 1984;79(3):261–273. - PubMed - DOI - PMC