Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar:40:1-11.
doi: 10.1200/EDBK_280279.

Medical Decision-Making in Oncology for Patients Lacking Capacity

Affiliations
Review

Medical Decision-Making in Oncology for Patients Lacking Capacity

Jonathan M Marron et al. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Modern oncology practice is built upon the idea that a patient with cancer has the legal and ethical right to make decisions about their medical care. There are situations in which patients might no longer be fully able to make decisions on their own behalf, however, and some patients never were able to do so. In such cases, it is critical to be aware of how to determine if a patient has the ability to make medical decisions and what should be done if they do not. In this article, we examine the concept of decision-making capacity in oncology and explore situations in which patients may have altered/diminished capacity (e.g., depression, cognitive impairment, delirium, brain tumor, brain metastases, etc.) or never had decisional capacity (e.g., minor children or developmentally disabled adults). We describe fundamental principles to consider when caring for a patient with cancer who lacks decisional capacity. We then introduce strategies for capacity assessment and discuss how clinicians might navigate scenarios in which their patients could lack capacity to make decisions about their cancer care. Finally, we explore ways in which pediatric and medical oncology can learn from one another with regard to these challenging situations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1:
FIGURE 1:
Model decisional capacity assessment framework for patients with cancer

References

    1. Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th edition New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
    1. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS. Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
    1. Raymont V, Bingley W, Buchanan A, et al. Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2004;364:1421–1427. - PubMed
    1. Casarett DJ, Karlawish JH, Hirschman KB. Identifying ambulatory cancer patients at risk of impaired capacity to consent to research. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003;26:615–624. - PubMed
    1. Kerrigan S, Erridge S, Liaquat I, et al. Mental incapacity in patients undergoing neuro-oncologic treatment: A cross-sectional study. Neurology 2014;83:537–541. - PubMed