Breast cancer treatment: A phased approach to implementation
- PMID: 32348571
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32910
Breast cancer treatment: A phased approach to implementation
Abstract
Optimal treatment outcomes for breast cancer are dependent on a timely diagnosis followed by an organized, multidisciplinary approach to care. However, in many low- and middle-income countries, effective care management pathways can be difficult to follow because of financial constraints, a lack of resources, an insufficiently trained workforce, and/or poor infrastructure. On the basis of prior work by the Breast Health Global Initiative, this article proposes a phased implementation strategy for developing sustainable approaches to enhancing patient care in limited-resource settings by creating roadmaps that are individualized and adapted to the baseline environment. This strategy proposes that, after a situational analysis, implementation phases begin with bolstering palliative care capacity, especially in settings where a late-stage diagnosis is common. This is followed by strengthening the patient pathway, with consideration given to a dynamic balance between centralization of services into centers of excellence to achieve better quality and decentralization of services to increase patient access. The use of resource checklists ensures that comprehensive therapy or palliative care can be delivered safely and effectively. Episodic or continuous monitoring with established process and quality metrics facilitates ongoing assessment, which should drive continual process improvements. A series of case studies provides a snapshot of country experiences with enhancing patient care, including the implementation of national cancer control plans in Kenya, palliative care in Romania, the introduction of a 1-stop clinic for diagnosis in Brazil, the surgical management of breast cancer in India, and the establishment of a women's cancer center in Ghana.
Keywords: breast cancer; cancer center of excellence; centralized care; decentralized care; dissemination and implementation science; early diagnosis; health disparities; low- and middle-income countries (LMICs); multidisciplinary evaluation; phased implementation; resource-stratification; supportive and palliative care; treatment; underserved communities.
© 2020 American Cancer Society.
References
-
- Ginsburg O, Yip CH, Brooks A, et al. Breast cancer early detection: a phased approach to implementation. Cancer. 2020;126(suppl):2365-2378.
-
- Anglade F, Milner DA, Brock JE. Can pathology diagnostics for cancer be stratified and serve global health? Cancer. 2020;126(suppl):2431-2438.
-
- Unger-Saldana K, Miranda A, Zarco-Espinosa G, Mainero-Ratchelous F, Bargallo-Rocha E, Miguel Lazaro-LeonJ. Health system delay and its effect on clinical stage of breast cancer: multicenter study. Cancer. 2015;121:2198-2206.
-
- Richards MA, Westcombe AM, Love SB, Littlejohns P, Ramirez AJ. Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. Lancet. 1999;353:1119-1126.
-
- Anderson BO, Cazap E, El Saghir NS, et al. Optimisation of breast cancer management in low-resource and middle-resource countries: executive summary of the Breast Health Global Initiative consensus, 2010. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:387-398.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- Novartis
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- National Breast Cancer Foundation
- GSP18BHGI001/KOMEN/Susan G. Komen/United States
- SAC170082/KOMEN/Susan G. Komen/United States
- 1R13CA224776-01A1/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- Pfizer
- American Society of Clinical Oncology
- American Society of Clinical Pathology
- Journal of Global Oncology
- pH Trust
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
- Union for International Cancer Control
- University of Washington
- Cepheid
- UE LifeSciences
- GE Healthcare
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
