Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;85(6):656-660.
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002350.

Reliability and Versatility of Reverse Sural Island Neurofasciocutaneous Leg Flaps

Goran R Stevanovic, Marija Z Dakovic-Bjelakovic  1 , Jadranka M Paravina  2 , Stefan Momčilović, Ivan Z Golubovic  3 , Nebojsa S Ignjatovic, Irena D Jankovic, Milan Radojkovic, Milica Nestorovic, Dejan Rancic, Zoran Rancic
Affiliations

Reliability and Versatility of Reverse Sural Island Neurofasciocutaneous Leg Flaps

Goran R Stevanovic et al. Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Distally based sural neurofasciocutaneous (NFC) flaps are a commonly used method for foot and ankle reconstruction given that they are much simpler and, at the same time, still efficient alternative to perforator flaps and free style free flaps.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the reliability and versatility of reverse sural island NFC flaps as a powerful and efficient method that can be used for repair of lower leg skin defects. This method does not require microsurgical facilities or extensive training.

Methodology: Patients with soft tissue defects of the distal third of the leg and ankle region received reverse sural island NFC flaps. Inclusion criteria included an absence of damage to the sural neurovascular axis or communicating perforators, absence of peripheral vascular disease, and the presence of soft tissue defects deep enough to expose tendon or bone. Patients were assessed for flap (defect) size, pedicle length and location of defects, postoperative flap survival rates, and complications. Donor sites were closed directly or skin grafted.

Results: Of 24 consecutive patient (20 male; 4 female), all flaps except 1 (4.16%), survived, although partial necrosis was observed in 2 patients (8.33%). The overall major complication rate was 12.50%. Epidermolysis was noted in 1 patient (4.16%). Three cases of transient venous congestion resolved without additional complications. The overall minor complication rate was 16.66%. Minimal complications were associated with healing of donor sites.

Conclusions: Reverse sural island NFC flaps provide adequate and aesthetically very acceptable coverage of soft tissue defects of the distal lower leg and proximal foot with no functional impairment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tajsiç N, Winkel R, Hoffmann R, et al. Sural perforator flap for reconstructive surgery in the lower leg and the foot: a clinical study of 86 patients with post-traumatic osteomyelitis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:1701–1708.
    1. Yao SQ, Zhang FQ, Pan JS, et al. Modified distally based sural nerve flaps in acute traumatic forefeet reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63:77–80.
    1. Jeng SF, Wei FC. Distally based sural island flap for foot and ankle reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:744–750.
    1. Jeng SF, Wei FC, Kuo YR. Salvage of the distal foot using the distally based sural island flap. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;43:499–505.
    1. Isenberg JS. When less is more: revascularization and sural artery fasciocutaneous flaps in ischemic limb salvage. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2003;19:235–240.

LinkOut - more resources