Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Jul;46(7):1247-1253.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

The additive value of restaging-CT during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The additive value of restaging-CT during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer

E C Gertsen et al. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Computed tomography (CT) is used for restaging of gastric cancer patients during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The treatment strategy could be altered after detection of distant interval metastases, possibly leading to a reduction in unnecessary chemotherapy cycles, its related toxicity, and surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the additive value of restaging-CT during NAC in guiding clinical decision making in gastric cancer.

Materials and methods: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study identified all patients with surgically resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4a-x, N0-3-x, M0-x), who started NAC with curative intent. Restaging-CT was performed after 2 out of 3 cycles of NAC. The primary outcome was treatment alterations made based on restaging-CT by a multidisciplinary tumor board. Confirmation of metastases was obtained by surgery or biopsy.

Results: Between 2007 and 2015, CT-restaging was performed in 122 out of 152 included patients and timed after 2 cycles (n = 76) or after 3 cycles (n = 46) of NAC. Restaging-CT revealed a metastasis in 1 out of 122 restaged patients (1%) after which surgical resection was omitted, whereas 4 patients (3%) with distant interval metastases were not identified by restaging-CT and underwent a futile laparotomy. In 5 out of 76 patients (7%) disease progression was detected while undergoing NAC, leading to omission of the 3rd cycle of chemotherapy.

Conclusion: The additive value of restaging-CT during NAC in gastric cancer is limited in guiding clinical decision making and therefore not recommended. Further studies may identify subgroups that may benefit of alternative diagnostic modalities.

Keywords: CT; Gastric cancer; Interval metastases; Restaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest ECG, CdJ, HJFB, ACM, IAMJB, ML, DB, DtBH, LvL, FJW, RvH and JPR declare that they have no declarations of interest.

Publication types

MeSH terms