Practice advisory update summary: Patent foramen ovale and secondary stroke prevention: Report of the Guideline Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
- PMID: 32350058
- PMCID: PMC7526671
- DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009443
Practice advisory update summary: Patent foramen ovale and secondary stroke prevention: Report of the Guideline Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
Abstract
Objective: To update the 2016 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) practice advisory for patients with stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO).
Methods: The guideline panel followed the AAN 2017 guideline development process to systematically review studies published through December 2017 and formulate recommendations.
Major recommendations: In patients being considered for PFO closure, clinicians should ensure that an appropriately thorough evaluation has been performed to rule out alternative mechanisms of stroke (level B). In patients with a higher risk alternative mechanism of stroke identified, clinicians should not routinely recommend PFO closure (level B). Clinicians should counsel patients that having a PFO is common; that it occurs in about 1 in 4 adults in the general population; that it is difficult to determine with certainty whether their PFO caused their stroke; and that PFO closure probably reduces recurrent stroke risk in select patients (level B). In patients younger than 60 years with a PFO and embolic-appearing infarct and no other mechanism of stroke identified, clinicians may recommend closure following a discussion of potential benefits (absolute recurrent stroke risk reduction of 3.4% at 5 years) and risks (periprocedural complication rate of 3.9% and increased absolute rate of non-periprocedural atrial fibrillation of 0.33% per year) (level C). In patients who opt to receive medical therapy alone without PFO closure, clinicians may recommend an antiplatelet medication such as aspirin or anticoagulation (level C).
© 2020 American Academy of Neurology.
References
-
- Gronseth GS, Cox J, Gloss D, et al. . Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual. Minneapolis, MN: The American Academy of Neurology; 2017.
-
- Guolo A, Varin C. Random-effects meta-analysis: the number of studies matters. Stat Methods Med Res 2017;26:1500–1518. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical