Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;30(3):216-227.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010055. Epub 2020 Apr 29.

Adverse events in the paediatric emergency department: a prospective cohort study

Affiliations

Adverse events in the paediatric emergency department: a prospective cohort study

Amy C Plint et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Understanding adverse events among children treated in the emergency department (ED) offers an opportunity to improve patient safety by providing evidence of where to focus efforts in a resource-restricted environment.

Objective: To estimate the risk of adverse events, their type, preventability and severity, for children seen in a paediatric ED.

Methods: This prospective cohort study examined outcomes of patients presenting to a paediatric ED over a 1-year period. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an adverse event (harm to patient related to healthcare received) related to ED care within 3 weeks of their visit. We conducted structured telephone interviews with all patients and families over a 3-week period following their visit to identify flagged outcomes (such as repeat ED visits, worsening symptoms) and screened admitted patients' health records with a validated trigger tool. For patients with flagged outcomes or triggers, three ED physicians independently determined whether an adverse event occurred.

Results: Of 1567 eligible patients, 1367 (87.2%) were enrolled and 1319 (96.5%) reached in follow-up. Median patient age was 4.34 years (IQR 1.5 to 10.57 years) and most (n=1281; 93.7%) were discharged. Among those with follow-up, 33 (2.5%, 95% CI 1.8% to 3.5%) suffered an adverse event related to ED care. None experienced more than one event. Twenty-nine adverse events (87.9%, 95% CI 72.7% to 95.2%) were deemed preventable. The most common types of adverse events (not mutually exclusive) were management issues (51.5%), diagnostic issues (45.5%) and suboptimal follow-up (15.2%).

Conclusion: One in 40 children suffered adverse events related to ED care. A high proportion of events were preventable. Management and diagnostic issues warrant further study.

Keywords: adverse events, epidemiology and detection; emergency department; paediatrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of patient enrolment and follow-up. ED, emergency department; RA, research assistant.

References

    1. Croskerry P, Sinclair D. Emergency medicine: a practice prone to error? CJEM 2001;3:271–6. 10.1017/S1481803500005765 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fordyce J, Blank FSj, Pekow P, et al. Errors in a busy emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2003;42:324–33. 10.1016/S0196-0644(03)00398-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Forster AJ, Rose NGW, van Walraven C, et al. Adverse events following an emergency department visit. Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:17–22. 10.1136/qshc.2005.017384 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calder LA, Forster A, Nelson M, et al. Adverse events among patients registered in high-acuity areas of the emergency department: a prospective cohort study. CJEM 2010;12:421–30. 10.1017/S1481803500012574 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friedman SM, Provan D, Moore S, et al. Errors, near misses and adverse events in the emergency department: what can patients tell us? CJEM 2008;10:421–7. 10.1017/S1481803500010484 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types