Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr 14:2020:7506590.
doi: 10.1155/2020/7506590. eCollection 2020.

Current Progress on Assessing the Prognosis for Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor (NMDAR) Encephalitis

Affiliations
Review

Current Progress on Assessing the Prognosis for Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor (NMDAR) Encephalitis

Hao Wang et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Abstract

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is the most common antineuronal antibody encephalitis in autoimmune encephalitis found at present. It has complex clinical manifestations such as psychiatric and behavioral abnormalities, seizures, movement disorders, consciousness, and autonomic dysfunction. The relationship between those manifestations and prognosis is unclear. Electroencephalography (EEG) is gradually becoming useful in the evaluation of the prognosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients, while imaging and antibody testing have a limited prognostic value. Starting the patients on adequate treatments (such as immunotherapy) in a timely fashion has a positive impact on their prognosis. Nevertheless, research on the prognosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis remains scarce. Here, we review the current advances of prognosis-related research from the clinical manifestations of the disease and auxiliary examinations such as EEG, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and antibody measurement. In addition, we also discuss the impact of different treatment options on prognosis. In-depth research on the prognosis of patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis will contribute to a better understanding of this disease, leading to better treatments options and, ultimately, a better prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dalmau J., Gleichman A. J., Hughes E. G., et al. Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies. The Lancet Neurology. 2008;7(12):1091–1098. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70224-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guasp M., Dalmau J. Encefalitis por anticuerpos contra el receptor de NMDA. Medicina Clínica. 2018;151(2):71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2017.10.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gable M. S., Sheriff H., Dalmau J., Tilley D. H., Glaser C. A. The frequency of autoimmune N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis surpasses that of individual viral etiologies in young individuals enrolled in the California Encephalitis Project. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2012;54(7):899–904. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir1038. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Titulaer M. J., McCracken L., Gabilondo I., et al. Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort study. The Lancet Neurology. 2013;12(2):157–165. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70310-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Montmollin E., Demeret S., Brulé N., et al. Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis in adult patients requiring intensive care. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2017;195(4):491–499. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201603-0507OC. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms