Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0231928.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231928. eCollection 2020.

Assessment of chromosome stability in boars

Affiliations

Assessment of chromosome stability in boars

Ewa Wójcik et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Chromosome instability adversely affects animal fertility and reproduction. Analysis of instability can be a valuable diagnostic tool. Helpful tests for assessment of instabilities include the sister chromatid exchange assay, identification of fragile sites, the bleomycin assay and the comet assay. These techniques can be used to assess and compare the chromosome stability of individual breeds of animals. The aim of the study was to assess chromosome stability in boars: Duroc, Duroc x Pietrain and Pietrain x Duroc crossbreds, Polish Large White, and the Neckar, P76 and PIC lines. The study assessed the chromosome stability of boars. The distribution of instabilities in individual breeds was varied. The average frequency of chromatid exchange was 4.8 ± 1.5, while that of fragile sites was 3.9 ± 1.4. The mean level of DNA damage (% tail DNA) was 9.4 ± 8.3, while in the bleomycin assay b/c and %AM were 0.6 ± 0.7 and 44.4 ± 4.1. A higher rate of instability was found in older individuals than in younger ones. The cytogenetic assays used to identify various forms of chromosome instability can be used to evaluate boars intended for breeding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author confirms that there is no known conflict of interest associated with this publication

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
A metaphase plate of boar chromosomes with identified a) SCE assay, b) FS assay, c) BLM assay, d) SCGE assay. Damage marked with arrows.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Number of instabilities identified in each breed of boar depending on age: a) SCE, b) FS, c) BLM b/c, d) BLM %AM, e) SCGE, f) DNA damage according to Gedik’s scale. (A) abcde mean values with different superscript letters are statistically different (P < 0.05) between breeds. (B)ab mean values with different superscript letters are statistically different (P < 0.05) between age groups 1 and 2.

References

    1. Nino-Soto M, King WA. Genetic factors that affect normal reproduction and fertility in domestic cattle. Med Vet Du Quebec Can. 2004;34: 71–72.
    1. Iannuzzi L. Cytogenetics in animal production. Ital J Anim Sci. 2007;6: 713–715. 10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.23 - DOI
    1. Khatun MR, Arifuzzaman Md, Ashraf A. Karyotype for identification of genetic abnormalities in cattle. Asian J Anim Vet Adv. 2011;6: 117–125.
    1. Basrur PK, Stranzinger G. Veterinary cytogenetics: past and perspective. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;120: 11–25. 10.1159/000118737 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Riggs PK, Rønne M. Fragile sites in domestic animal chromosomes: molecular insights and challenges. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2009;126: 97–109. 10.1159/000245910 - DOI - PubMed