Effects of individual pelvic floor muscle training vs individual training progressing to group training vs group training alone in women with stress urinary incontinence: A randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 32353206
- DOI: 10.1002/nau.24370
Effects of individual pelvic floor muscle training vs individual training progressing to group training vs group training alone in women with stress urinary incontinence: A randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Aims: To assess the effects of individual pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training vs individual training (IT) progressing to group training (GT) vs group-only training in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Methods: Randomized controlled and pragmatic clinical trials with 90 women with SUI. Participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups: IT, GT, or four individual sessions progressing to group training (IPGT). The intervention included 12 sessions, once a week, with direct supervision by a physical therapist.
Primary outcome: severity according to the King's Health Questionnaire.
Secondary outcomes: PFM function by palpation and manometer, bladder and exercise diaries, PFM training adherence, and self-efficacy. Reassessments were conducted at the end of the intervention, 3 and 6 months after the intervention. Intra- and intergroup analysis for all outcomes was performed using a multivariate analysis of variance. In the mixed-effects model used, the evaluation groups and times and their interactions were considered. A significance level of 5% was adopted.
Results: After the intervention, the severity measure improved in all three groups (P < .001), without difference between them (P = .56). The benefits of the intervention were maintained 3 and 6 months after the end of the supervised training (P < .001). The IPGT group had a significant improvement in PFM function when compared to the other groups posttreatment (P < .001).
Conclusion: PFM training improved the severity of urinary incontinence in all groups after 12 sessions of training supervised by a physical therapist. IT progressing to GT improved the function of upper PFM when compared to the other groups.
Keywords: manometry; muscles; pelvic floor; self-efficacy; urinary incontinence.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Arshiya S, Noor L, Rangaswamy PA, Sundari T. Etiology, risk factors and pathophysiology of stress urinary incontinence: a review. Int J Biol Sci. 2015;4(6):75-82.
-
- Milsom IMB, Gyhagen M. Breaking news in the prediction of pelvic floor disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;54:41-48.
-
- Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5-26.
-
- Dedicação AC, Haddad M, Saldanha MES, Driusso P. Comparison of quality of life for different types of female urinary incontinence. Braz J Phys Ther. 2009;13(2):116-122.
-
- Dumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;(10):CD005654. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005654.pub4
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- nº BDS-0017-00071.01.11/15/Foundation for Support in Scientific and Technological Development of Ceará (FUNCAP, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil)/International
- Finance Code 001/Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES)/International
- project number 2016/0638-4/São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)/International
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous