Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr;5(4):e002293.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002293.

Practical actions for fostering cross-disciplinary global health research: lessons from a narrative literature review

Affiliations
Review

Practical actions for fostering cross-disciplinary global health research: lessons from a narrative literature review

Yan Ding et al. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Global health research involves disciplines within and beyond the health sciences. A cross-disciplinary collaborative research approach enables an interchange of knowledge and experience and stimulates innovative responses to complex health challenges. However, there is little robust evidence to guide the design and implementation of cross-disciplinary research in global health, hampering effective collective action. This review synthesised evidence on practical actions for fostering cross-disciplinary research to provide guidance on the design and implementation of research in global health.

Methods: We searched five electronic databases using key words. The search included original research and research notes articles in English. We used a framework adapted from the socio-ecological model and thematic synthesis for data analysis.

Results: Thirty-six original research and 27 research notes articles were included in the review. These were predominantly from high-income countries and indicated that practical actions on fostering cross-disciplinary research are closely linked to leadership and teamwork which should be planned and implemented at research team and institutional levels. The publications also indicated that individual qualities such as being receptive to new ideas and funders' power and influence have practical implications for conducting cross-disciplinary research. Practical actions that individuals, research team leaders, academic institutions and funders can undertake to foster cross-disciplinary research were identified.

Conclusion: Our review found evidence from high-income countries, not low-and-middle-income countries, about practices that can improve cross-disciplinary research in global health. Critical knowledge gaps exist around how leadership and teamwork processes can better integrate expertise from different disciplines to make cross-disciplinary research more effective.

Keywords: health systems; public health; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analytical framework for this narrative literature review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart for the search and selection process for eligible publications.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Practical actions for fostering cross-disciplinary research.

References

    1. Abimbola S. The information problem in global health. BMJ Glob Health 2016;1:e900001. 10.1136/bmjgh-2015-900001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farmer P, et al. Reimagining global health: an introduction. Univ of California Press, 2013.
    1. Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, et al. Towards a common definition of global health. Lancet 2009;373:1993–5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60332-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fried LP, Bentley ME, Buekens P, et al. Global health is public health. Lancet 2010;375:535–7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60203-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sommer M, Parker R. Structural approaches in public health. Routledge, 2013.

Publication types