Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 May-Jun;34(3):1297-1305.
doi: 10.21873/invivo.11905.

BIT-ART: Multicentric Comparison of HDR-brachytherapy, Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy and Tomotherapy for Advanced Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

BIT-ART: Multicentric Comparison of HDR-brachytherapy, Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy and Tomotherapy for Advanced Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer

Anna Rita Alitto et al. In Vivo. 2020 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background/aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in patients with high- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Patients and methods: We evaluated data of patients from three Radiation Oncology Departments (Rome, Lübeck and Perugia). Patients treated in Rome underwent exclusive intensity-modulated-radiotherapy (IMRT) or IMRT plus high-dose-rate interventional radiotherapy (HDR-IRT). IMRT plus two fractions HDR-IRT was performed in Lübeck, while in Perugia Helical Tomotherapy was performed. The Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Event (Version 4.03) scale was used to describe acute and late toxicity.

Results: At a median follow-up of 28 months, all 51 patients were alive and disease-free. Patients treated by HDR-IRT plus VMAT showed only G1-2 genitourinary- gastrointestinal (GU-GI) acute and late toxicity. Univariate analysis showed a lower risk of acute GU toxicity (p=0.048) in IMRT+HDR-IRT.

Conclusion: Low grade and less acute GU toxicity was observed in patients undergoing HDR-IRT boost.

Keywords: HDR brachytherapy; Personalized medicine; VMAT; focal therapy; helical tomotherapy; prostate cancer; toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Authors have declared no conflicts of interest regarding this study

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Dose distribution of HDR-IRT (Rome 1a) and biological planning (Luebeck 1b). Axial views show high conformality of HDR-IRT. a) Isodose lines: Cyan 15.0 Gy – Green 17.25 Gy – Red 37.5 Gy. b) Isodose lines: Yellow 7.5 Gy – Green 10.00 Gy – Red 15.0 Gy – Blue 30.0 Gy.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Dose distribution of helical tomotherapy (HT). Axial views show dose distribution relative to HT planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (Perugia)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Dose distribution of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Axial views show dose distribution relative to IMRT planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (Rome 3a and Luebeck 3b)

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7–34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kuban DA, Tucker SL, Dong L, Starkschall G, Huang EH, Cheung MR, Lee AK, Pollack A. Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(1):67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.054. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Autorino R, Vicenzi L, Tagliaferri L, Soatti C, Kovacs G, Aristei C. A national survey of airo (italian association of radiation oncology) brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy) study group. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2018;10(3):254–259. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2018.76981. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mohler JL, Antonarakis ES, Armstrong AJ, D'Amico AV, Davis BJ, Dorff T, Eastham JA, Enke CA, Farrington TA, Higano CS, Horwitz EM, Hurwitz M, Ippolito JE, Kane CJ, Kuettel MR, Lang JM, McKenney J, Netto G, Penson DF, Plimack ER, Pow-Sang JM, Pugh TJ, Richey S, Roach M, Rosenfeld S, Schaeffer E, Shabsigh A, Small EJ, Spratt DE, Srinivas S, Tward J, Shead DA, Freedman-Cass DA. Prostate Cancer, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(5):479–505. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoskin PJ, Colombo A, Henry A, Niehoff P, Paulsen Hellebust T, Siebert F-A, Kovacs G. Gec/estro recommendations on high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for localised prostate cancer: An update. Radiother Oncol. 2013;107(3):325–332. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.05.002. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms