Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May-Jun;34(3):1533-1539.
doi: 10.21873/invivo.11942.

The Clinical Significance of Lymphovascular Invasion in Gastric Cancer

Affiliations

The Clinical Significance of Lymphovascular Invasion in Gastric Cancer

Hirohito Fujikawa et al. In Vivo. 2020 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background/aim: Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is recognized as a prognostic predictor of recurrence in certain carcinomas. According to current Japanese guidelines, however, in gastric cancer, LVI is not clinically useful information, except for predicting the curability of endoscopic resection. We clarified the clinical significance of LVI in gastric cancer and its correlation with disease prognosis.

Patients and methods: A total of 2,090 cases of gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy were enrolled. The correlation of LVI and other histopathological factors was evaluated with regards to patient prognosis.

Results: LVI(+) was noted in 894 cases. A multivariate analysis showed that pT, pN, and LVI were independent risk factors for patient prognosis. In pT2-4 patients with nodal metastasis, a significant difference was revealed, and the 5-year overall survival rates in LVI(+) cases were lower than those in LVI(-) (60.9% vs. 76.7%, p=0.005).

Conclusion: LVI in gastric cancer is an independent prognostic factor, and tends to worsen prognosis, especially in advanced cancers with lymph node metastases.

Keywords: Gastric cancer; lymphovascular invasion; prognostic factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest with regard to this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Impact of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) on the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. (A) Log-rank test for all 2,090 patients; (B) Log-rank test for early gastric cancer patients (T1); (C) Log-rank test for advance gastric cancer (T2-4)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in patients stratified by each T-factor and N-factor. (A) Log-rank test for T1 N-; (B) Log-rank test for T1 N+; (C) Log-rank test for T2-4 N-; (D) Log-rank test for T2-4 N+

References

    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359–386. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hotta T. Tokyo: Foundation for Promotion Cancer Research. Cancer Statistics in Japan 2005. 2017
    1. Siewert JR, Bottcher K, Stein HJ, Roder JD. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg. 1998;228:449–461. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199810000-00002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiao XG, Deng JY, Zhang RP, Wu LL, Wang L, Liu HG, Hao XS, Liang H. Prognostic value of number of examined lymph nodes in patients with node-negative gastric Cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;(13):3640–3648. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i13.3640. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Song YJ, Shin SH, Cho JS, Park MH, Yoon JH, Jegal YJ. The role of lymphovascular invasion as a prognostic factor in patients with lymph node-positive operable invasive breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2011;14(3):198–203. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2011.14.3.198. - DOI - PMC - PubMed