Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 30;10(1):7366.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61566-2.

Short-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Paraesophageal Hiatal Hernia Repair

Affiliations

Short-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Paraesophageal Hiatal Hernia Repair

Raelina S Howell et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Many patients with hiatal hernias (HH) are asymptomatic; however, symptoms may include heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, nausea, or vague epigastric pain depending on the hernia type and severity. The ideal technique and timing of repair remains controversial. This report describes short-term outcomes and readmissions of patients undergoing HH repair at our institution. All patients who underwent HH repair from January 2012 through April 2017 were reviewed. Patients undergoing concomitant bariatric surgery were excluded. 239 patients were identified and 128 were included. Eighty-eight were female (69%) and 40 were male (31%) with a mean age of 59 years (range 20-91 years) and a mean BMI of 29.2 kg/m2 (17-42). Worsening GERD was the most common presenting symptom in 79 (61.7%) patients. Eighty-four laparoscopic cases (65.6%) and 44 robotic assisted (34.4%) procedures were performed. Mesh was used in 59 operations (3 polytetrafluoroethylene; 56 biologic). All hiatal hernia types (I-IV) were collected. Majority were initial operations (89%). Techniques included: Toupet fundoplication in 68 cases (63.0%), Nissen fundoplication in 36 (33.3%), Dor fundoplication in 4 (3.7%), concomitant Collis gastroplasty in 4 (3.1%), and primary suture repair in 20 (15.6%). Outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic procedures were compared. Length of stay was reported as median and interquartile range for laparoscopic and robotic: 1.0 day (1.0-3.0) and 2.0 days (1.0-2.5); p = 0.483. Thirty-day readmission occurred in 9 patients, 7 (8.3%) laparoscopic and 2 (4.6%) robotic; p = 0.718. Two 30-day reoperations occurred, both laparoscopic; p = 0.545. Total of 16 complications occurred; 18.6% had a complication with the use of mesh compared to 8.7% without the use of mesh, p = 0.063. There were no conversion to open modality and no mortalities were reported. Hiatal hernia repair can be performed safely with a low incidence of complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Roman S, Kahrilas PJ. The diagnosis and management of hiatus hernia. BMJ. 2014;349:g6154. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6154. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hyun JJ, Bak YT. Clinical significance of hiatal hernia. Gut Liver. 2011;5:267–77. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2011.5.3.267. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Che F, Nguyen B, Cohen A, Nguyen NT. Prevalence of hiatal hernia in the morbidly obese. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. 2013;9:920–924. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.03.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE. Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2008;22:601–16. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2007.12.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lebenthal A, Waterford SD, Fisichella PM. Treatment and controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair. Front Surg. 2015;2:13. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed